Address · Ward 23 · Jamaal Myers

33 Murray Ave

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 1; 1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations: 12; 5 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 5; No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 23 · Jamaal Myers
Location: 43.78506, -79.26965
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

WORDS Media & Communications Inc.SM26220 · 14 May 201812

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Ward 39 Scarborough-Agincourt3
Ward 40 Scarborough-Agincourt3
Scarborough Building2
Scarborough Community Planning2
Norm Kelly2

Data table· 5 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 39 Scarborough-Agincourt	Member of council	3	1	5 July 2018
Ward 40 Scarborough-Agincourt	Member of council	3	1	5 July 2018
Scarborough Building	City staff	2	0	5 July 2018
Scarborough Community Planning	City staff	2	0	5 July 2018
Norm Kelly	Councillor staff	2	0	27 July 2018

All registrations· 1 row

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM26220	WORDS Media & Communications Inc.	33 Murray Avenue	Planning and Development, Heritage	14 May 2018 – 31 December 2019	12

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 12 December 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0263/25SCClosed · Approved
Submitted 12 December 2025Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0040/25SCConditional Consent · Approved
Submitted 1 September 2022Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0184/22SCClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 1 September 2022Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0185/22SCClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 1 September 2022Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0026/22SCClosed · Approved

Data table· 5 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
A0263/25SC Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	12 December 2025	Closed Approved
B0040/25SC Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	12 December 2025	Conditional Consent Approved
A0184/22SC Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	1 September 2022	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
A0185/22SC Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	1 September 2022	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
B0026/22SC Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	1 September 2022	Closed Approved

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 23

3 lobbied · 32 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 23: 3 lobbied and 32 matched unlobbied applications in 3 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	3	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	32	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.