Address · Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
33 Hawarden Cres
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Location
- 43.69422, -79.41529
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
9- Submitted 6 September 2023Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0770/23TEYApplication Withdrawn · Withdrawn
- Submitted 6 September 2023Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0774/23TEYApplication Withdrawn · Withdrawn
- Submitted 6 September 2023Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0776/23TEYApplication Withdrawn · Withdrawn
- Submitted 5 September 2023Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0767/23TEYApplication Withdrawn · Withdrawn
- Submitted 5 September 2023Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0768/23TEYApplication Withdrawn · Withdrawn
- Submitted 5 September 2023Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0769/23TEYApplication Withdrawn · Withdrawn
- Submitted 5 September 2023Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0049/23TEYApplication Withdrawn · Withdrawn
- Submitted 5 October 2020Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0878/20TEYApplication Withdrawn · Withdrawn
- Submitted 5 October 2020Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0061/20TEYApplication Withdrawn · Withdrawn
Data table· 9 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0770/23TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 6 September 2023 | Application Withdrawn Withdrawn |
| A0774/23TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 6 September 2023 | Application Withdrawn Withdrawn |
| A0776/23TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 6 September 2023 | Application Withdrawn Withdrawn |
| A0767/23TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 5 September 2023 | Application Withdrawn Withdrawn |
| A0768/23TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 5 September 2023 | Application Withdrawn Withdrawn |
| A0769/23TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 5 September 2023 | Application Withdrawn Withdrawn |
| B0049/23TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 5 September 2023 | Application Withdrawn Withdrawn |
| A0878/20TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 5 October 2020 | Application Withdrawn Withdrawn |
| B0061/20TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 5 October 2020 | Application Withdrawn Withdrawn |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 12
20 lobbied · 357 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | 106 | 50% (n=12) | 50% | 35% | 86% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 357 | 145 | 90% (n=291) | 10% | 5% | 30% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.