Address · Ward 12 · Josh Matlow

33 Davisville Ave

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 3; 2 client organisations
Communications on those registrations: 12; 3 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 8; No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
Location: 43.69833, -79.39487
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

OSMINGTON GEROFSKY DEVELOPMENT CORPSM33291 · 30 May 20225
CAPREITSM34345 · 18 April 20234
CAPREITSM33299 · 1 June 20223

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Josh Matlow6
Ward 12 Toronto-St. Paul's5
Josh Matlow1

Data table· 3 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Josh Matlow	Councillor staff	6	5	19 January 2024
Ward 12 Toronto-St. Paul's	Member of council	5	3	23 June 2022
Josh Matlow	Councillor staff	1	0	30 May 2022

All registrations· 3 rows

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM34345	CAPREIT	33 Davisville Avenue	Planning and Development; Planning and Development, Combined Application	18 April 2023 – 31 December 2025	4
SM33299	CAPREIT	33 Davisville Avenue	Planning and Development; Planning and Development, Combined Application	1 June 2022 – 31 December 2022	3
SM33291	OSMINGTON GEROFSKY DEVELOPMENT CORP	33 Davisville Avenue	Planning and Development	30 May 2022 – 31 December 2026	5

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 2 May 2024Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0031/24TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 2 May 2024Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application COA-5432462Cancelled · Withdrawn
Submitted 14 June 2022Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 22 162080 STE 12 SAUnder Review · In progress
Submitted 14 June 2022Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 22 162082 STE 12 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 4 March 2020Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0473/20TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 18 February 2020Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0015/20TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 18 February 2020Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application COA-4721268Cancelled · Withdrawn
Submitted 11 December 2018Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0109/18TEYClosed · Withdrawn

Data table· 8 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
B0031/24TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	2 May 2024	Closed Approved
COA-5432462 Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	2 May 2024	Cancelled Withdrawn
22 162080 STE 12 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	14 June 2022	Under Review In progress
22 162082 STE 12 OZ Development application	Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)	14 June 2022	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
A0473/20TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	4 March 2020	Closed Approved
B0015/20TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	18 February 2020	Closed Approved
COA-4721268 Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	18 February 2020	Cancelled Withdrawn
B0109/18TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	11 December 2018	Closed Withdrawn

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide

26 lobbied · 179 matched

Median days

Lobbied184
Matched, unlobbied115

Approval rate

Lobbied79% n=24
Matched, unlobbied88% n=133

Refusal rate

Lobbied21%
Matched, unlobbied12%

Appeal rate

Lobbied15%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Objection rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied25%

Data table· 2 rows

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide: 26 lobbied and 179 matched unlobbied applications in 21 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	26	184	79% (n=24)	21%	15%	25%
Matched, unlobbied	179	115	88% (n=133)	12%	3%	25%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Committee of Adjustment applications

Minor variance (MV), Ward 12

20 lobbied · 357 matched

Median days

Lobbied106
Matched, unlobbied145

Approval rate

Lobbied50% n=12
Matched, unlobbied90% n=291

Refusal rate

Lobbied50%
Matched, unlobbied10%

Appeal rate

Lobbied35%
Matched, unlobbied5%

Objection rate

Lobbied86%
Matched, unlobbied30%

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 12: 20 lobbied and 357 matched unlobbied applications in 7 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	20	106	50% (n=12)	50%	35%	86%
Matched, unlobbied	357	145	90% (n=291)	10%	5%	30%

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12

32 lobbied · 72 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied511

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=4
Matched, unlobbied100% n=7

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied3%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=61
Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12: 32 lobbied and 72 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	32	—	100% (n=4)	0%	3%	0.00
Matched, unlobbied	72	511	100% (n=7)	0%	0%	0.05

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=61)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,237	727	97% (n=96)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12

44 lobbied · 60 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,799

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=9
Matched, unlobbied100% n=9

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied14%
Matched, unlobbied10%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12: 44 lobbied and 60 matched unlobbied applications in 26 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	44	1,925	100% (n=9)	0%	14%	0.02
Matched, unlobbied	60	1,799	100% (n=9)	0%	10%	0.04

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.