325 Humber College Blvd

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 2; 1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations: 5; 3 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 2; 1 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 1 · Vincent Crisanti
Location: 43.73649, -79.61096
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Purolator Inc.SM29859 · 9 March 20204
Purolator Inc.SM30056 · 8 May 20201

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Mayor John Tory3
Councillor Michael Thompson1
Mayor Tory1

Data table· 3 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Last contact
Mayor John Tory	Councillor staff	3	24 March 2020
Councillor Michael Thompson	Councillor staff	1	27 March 2020
Mayor Tory	Councillor staff	1	25 August 2020

All registrations· 2 rows

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM30056	Purolator Inc.	325 Humber College Blvd	Planning and Development	8 May 2020 – 9 December 2020	1
SM29859	Purolator Inc.	325 Humber College Boulevard.	Building Permits; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan	9 March 2020 – 31 March 2020	4

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 23 December 2019Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0685/19EYKClosed · Approved
Submitted 30 October 2019Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 19 243338 WET 01 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 2 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
A0685/19EYK Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	23 December 2019	Closed Approved
19 243338 WET 01 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	30 October 2019	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

325 Humber College Blvd · Site Plan Approval (SA)
19 243338 WET 01 SA · submitted 30 October 2019 · Closed · from registration SM29859 (Purolator Inc.)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.94
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM29859: We will be assisting Purolator with respect to its new hub at 325 Humber College Boulevard. Specifically trying to see their Site Plan Assessment and building permits go forward in a timely manner to see this $330 million project proceed on schedule. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 243338 WET 01 SA at 325 Humber College Blvd: New Purolator hub (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: We will be assisting Purolator with respect to its new hub at 325 Humber College Boulevard. Specifically trying to see their Site Plan Assessment and building permits go forward in a timely manner to see this $3…
Matched fields
address
325 HUMBER COLLEGE BLVD
application_address
325 HUMBER COLLEGE BLVD

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 1

2 lobbied · 42 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 1: 2 lobbied and 42 matched unlobbied applications in 2 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	2	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	42	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 1

4 lobbied · 12 matched