Address · Ward 14 · Paula Fletcher
322 Cosburn Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 14 · Paula Fletcher
- Location
- 43.69204, -79.33838
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
6- Submitted 14 August 2026Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0605/26TEYHearing Scheduled · In progress
- Submitted 14 August 2026Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0617/26TEYHearing Scheduled · In progress
- Submitted 17 February 2023Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0013/23TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 14 February 2023Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0159/23TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 14 February 2023Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0160/23TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 14 February 2023Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application COA-5229692Cancelled · Withdrawn
Data table· 6 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0605/26TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 14 August 2026 | Hearing Scheduled In progress |
| A0617/26TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 14 August 2026 | Hearing Scheduled In progress |
| B0013/23TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 17 February 2023 | Closed Approved |
| A0159/23TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 14 February 2023 | Closed Approved |
| A0160/23TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 14 February 2023 | Closed Approved |
| COA-5229692 Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 14 February 2023 | Cancelled Withdrawn |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 14
4 lobbied · 69 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 69 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 14
2 lobbied · 32 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 32 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.