Address · Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
321 Davenport Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Location
- 43.67452, -79.40107
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
5These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 3 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 1 September 2017 |
| Ward 11 University-Rosedale | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 11 March 2021 |
| Dianne Saxe | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 27 March 2024 |
All registrations· 5 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM35365 | 1707397 Ontario Inc. and Dr. Philip Solomon | 321 Davenport Road. | Building Permits; By-law / Regulation; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 29 February 2024 – 28 February 2025 | 1 |
| SM35359 | 1707397 Ontario Inc. and Dr. Philip Solomon | 321 Davenport Road. | Building Permits; By-law / Regulation; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 28 February 2024 – 27 February 2025 | 0 |
| SM31394 | The Alterra Group of Companies | 321 Davenport Road. | Planning and Development; Environmental Assessment | 11 March 2021 – 1 December 2021 | 1 |
| SM27486 | Alterra Developments 2000 Limited | 321 Davenport Road | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Plan of … | 30 January 2019 – 31 December 2026 | 0 |
| SM24946 | Margaret Atwood | 321 Davenport Road. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Pla… | 9 August 2017 – 17 December 2018 | 2 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 17 March 2026Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 26 130929 STE 11 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 28 October 2021Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 21 231473 STE 11 CDUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 9 August 2019Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 19 203460 STE 11 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 25 April 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 145386 STE 20 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26 130929 STE 11 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 17 March 2026 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 21 231473 STE 11 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 28 October 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| 19 203460 STE 11 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 9 August 2019 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 16 145386 STE 20 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 25 April 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
321 Davenport Rd · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
21 231473 STE 11 CD · submitted 28 October 2021 · Under Review · from registration SM27486 (Alterra Developments 2000 Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.71
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM27486: Pursuing development approvals and building permits for 321 Davenport Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 231473 STE 11 CD at 321 Davenport Rd: *** Draft Plan of Condominium for 23 residential units in a 9-storey residential building. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Pursuing development approvals and building permits for 321 Davenport Road
Matched fields
- address
- 321 DAVENPORT RD
- application_address
- 321 DAVENPORT RD
321 Davenport Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 145386 STE 20 OZ · submitted 25 April 2016 · Closed · from registration SM24946 (Margaret Atwood)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM24946: Rezoning application and proposed mid-rise development at 321 Davenport Road. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 145386 STE 20 OZ at 321 Davenport Rd: Rezoning application to allow construction of a 21-unit in a 9-storey apartment building (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Rezoning application and proposed mid-rise development at 321 Davenport Road.
Matched fields
- address
- 321 DAVENPORT RD
- application_address
- 321 DAVENPORT RD
Council and committee items naming this address
- 321 Davenport Road - Construction Staging Area2023.TE9.42 · 14 December 2023
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11
46 lobbied · 113 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 46 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 9% | 0.09 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 113 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.02 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 11
4 lobbied · 10 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 10 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11
69 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 69 | — | 100% (n=10) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.