Address · Ward 13 · Chris Moise
315 Queen St E
- Communications on those registrations
- 0
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Location
- 43.65508, -79.36600
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM11880 | The Berkeley Church Heritage Event Venue | 315 Queen Street East | Planning Application, Heritage alteration | 23 June 2008 – 31 July 2008 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 11 April 2022Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0028/22TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 25 May 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 161250 STE 28 OZOMB Approved · Approved
- Submitted 25 May 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 161258 STE 28 SAUnder Review · In progress
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| B0028/22TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 11 April 2022 | Closed Approved |
| 16 161250 STE 28 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 25 May 2016 | OMB Approved Approved |
| 16 161258 STE 28 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 25 May 2016 | Under Review In progress |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
301 Queen St E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 161250 STE 28 OZ · submitted 25 May 2016 · OMB Approved · from registration SM25255 (1. James Gault Holdings Inc , 2. 1175484 Ontario Inc. 3. 1606077 Ontario Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25255: application for Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw amwendment affecting 301-317 Queen Street East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 161250 STE 28 OZ at 301 Queen St E: Proposal for a new 19-storey mixed-use building next to the existing Berkeley Church, containing 150 dwelling units and 1,066 square metres of non-residential gross floor area. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: application for Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw amwendment affecting 301-317 Queen Street East
Matched fields
- address
- 301-317 QUEEN ST E
- application_address
- 301 QUEEN ST E
301 Queen St E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 161250 STE 28 OZ · submitted 25 May 2016 · OMB Approved · from registration SM25438 (Berkeley Events)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25438: Proposed redevelopment of 301-317 Queen Street East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 161250 STE 28 OZ at 301 Queen St E: Proposal for a new 19-storey mixed-use building next to the existing Berkeley Church, containing 150 dwelling units and 1,066 square metres of non-residential gross floor area. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Proposed redevelopment of 301-317 Queen Street East
Matched fields
- address
- 301-317 QUEEN ST E
- application_address
- 301 QUEEN ST E
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13
82 lobbied · 96 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 82 | — | 100% (n=13) | 0% | 11% | 0.15 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 96 | — | 90% (n=14) | 10% | 16% | 0.08 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13
56 lobbied · 128 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 56 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 7% | 0.16 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 128 | — | 100% (n=8) | 0% | 2% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.