Address · Ward 8 · Mike Colle
3130 Dufferin St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 8 · Mike Colle
- Location
- 43.71579, -79.45570
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
5These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 5 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 24 Willowdale | Member of council | 10 | 9 | 4 May 2016 |
| Ward 15 Eglinton-Lawrence | Member of council | 9 | 9 | 12 May 2016 |
| Councillor Colle, Ward 15 | Councillor staff | 6 | 6 | 12 May 2016 |
| Councillor Shiner, Ward 15 | Councillor staff | 2 | 2 | 12 May 2016 |
| Office of Councillor Colle, Ward 15 | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 12 May 2016 |
All registrations· 5 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM23097 | Yorkdale Ford Lincoln Sales Ltd. | 3130 Dufferin Street | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 10 May 2016 – 10 May 2017 | 2 |
| SM23100 | Yorkdale Ford Lincoln Sales Ltd. | 3130 Dufferin street | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 10 May 2016 – 10 May 2017 | 0 |
| SM22954 | Yorkdale Ford Lincoln Sales Ltd. | 3130 Dufferin Street | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 1 April 2016 – 31 December 2024 | 6 |
| SM22955 | Yorkdale Ford Lincoln Sales Ltd. | 3130 Dufferin Street | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 1 April 2016 – 28 December 2016 | 6 |
| SM22956 | Yorkdale Ford Lincoln Sales Ltd. | 3130 Dufferin Street | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 1 April 2016 – 30 August 2017 | 14 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
1- Submitted 23 March 2012Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 12 142013 NNY 15 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 1 row
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 142013 NNY 15 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 23 March 2012 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8
33 lobbied · 57 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 33 | — | 100% (n=2) | 0% | 12% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 57 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 27% | 0.03 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.