Address · Ward 3 · Amber Morley
31 Windsor St
- Communications on those registrations
- 0
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 3 · Amber Morley
- Location
- 43.61924, -79.49756
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM31234 | Sandro DeZen | 31 Windsor Street | Planning and Development; Planning and Development Application; Planning and Development Applicatio… | 2 February 2021 – 2 February 2022 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 8 September 2025Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 25 221763 WET 03 SANOAC Issued · Approved
- Submitted 28 June 2023Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 23 167119 WET 03 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25 221763 WET 03 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 8 September 2025 | NOAC Issued Approved |
| 23 167119 WET 03 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 28 June 2023 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
60 Newcastle St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
23 167119 WET 03 OZ · submitted 28 June 2023 · Closed · from registration SM34074 (Diamante Building Group Corp)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.91
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM34074: Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Bylaw Amendment for development of lands; 21,23,25,31, Windsor St., 18 Buckingham St., 93 Portland St., 60 Newcastle St. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 23 167119 WET 03 OZ at 60 Newcastle St: Proposal for mid- to high-rise buildings ranging in height from 7 to 46 storeys, with heights decreasing towards the north, as distance from the Mimico GO Station increases. The tallest proposed building includes two towers (32 and 46 storeys) connected by an 8-storey podium with retail uses at gra… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Bylaw Amendment for development of lands; 21,23,25,31, Windsor St., 18 Buckingham St., 93 Portland St., 60 Newcastle St.
Matched fields
- address
- 18 BUCKINGHAM ST
- application_address
- 18 BUCKINGHAM ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 3
24 lobbied · 100 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 24 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 4% | 0.25 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 100 | — | 71% (n=10) | 29% | 4% | 0.14 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 3
37 lobbied · 72 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 37 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 16% | 0.27 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 15% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.