Address · Ward 7 · Anthony Perruzza
31 Flindon Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 7 · Anthony Perruzza
- Location
- 43.72060, -79.53860
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Councilllor's Office Ward 7 | Councillor staff | 2 | 1 | 24 September 2015 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM22187 | Joseph Coccaro | 31 Flindon Rd. | Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance; Planning and Development Application, Consent… | 3 September 2015 – 19 September 2018 | 2 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
5- Submitted 8 July 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0258/25EYKClosed · Approved
- Submitted 29 December 2023Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0513/23EYKClosed · Approved
- Submitted 2 July 2015Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0395/15EYKClosed · Approved
- Submitted 2 July 2015Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0396/15EYKClosed · Approved
- Submitted 2 July 2015Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0044/15EYKClosed · Approved
Data table· 5 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0258/25EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 8 July 2025 | Closed Approved |
| A0513/23EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 29 December 2023 | Closed Approved |
| A0395/15EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 2 July 2015 | Closed Approved |
| A0396/15EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 2 July 2015 | Closed Approved |
| B0044/15EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 2 July 2015 | Closed Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
31 Flindon Rd · Minor variance (MV)
A0395/15EYK · submitted 2 July 2015 · Closed · from registration SM22187 (Joseph Coccaro)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.87
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22187: 31 Flindon Rd. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0395/15EYK at 31 Flindon Rd: To construct a new detached dwelling with an attached garage. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 31 Flindon Rd.
Matched fields
- address
- 31 FLINDON RD
- application_address
- 31 FLINDON RD
31 Flindon Rd · Minor variance (MV)
A0396/15EYK · submitted 2 July 2015 · Closed · from registration SM22187 (Joseph Coccaro)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22187: 31 Flindon Rd. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0396/15EYK at 31 Flindon Rd: To construct a new detached dwelling with an attached garage. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 31 Flindon Rd.
Matched fields
- address
- 31 FLINDON RD
- application_address
- 31 FLINDON RD
31 Flindon Rd · Consent (severance) (CO)
B0044/15EYK · submitted 2 July 2015 · Closed · from registration SM22187 (Joseph Coccaro)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.93
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM22187: 31 Flindon Rd. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application B0044/15EYK at 31 Flindon Rd: To obtain consent to sever the property into two residential lots. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 31 Flindon Rd.
Matched fields
- address
- 31 FLINDON RD
- application_address
- 31 FLINDON RD
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 7
1 lobbied · 17 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 7
2 lobbied · 8 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.