301 Dixon Rd

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 1; 1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations: 0
Applications at this address: 2; 1 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 2 · Stephen Holyday
Location: 43.69490, -79.55257
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Starlight InvestmentsSM33169 · 20 April 20220

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

No communications recorded.

All registrations· 1 row

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM33169	Starlight Investments	301 Dixon Road	Planning and Development Application; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law	20 April 2022 – 31 December 2022	0

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 5 December 2024Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application COA-5552363Cancelled · Withdrawn
Submitted 28 February 2022Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 22 117779 WET 02 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 2 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
COA-5552363 Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	5 December 2024	Cancelled Withdrawn
22 117779 WET 02 OZ Development application	Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)	28 February 2022	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

301 Dixon Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
22 117779 WET 02 OZ · submitted 28 February 2022 · Closed · from registration SM33169 (Starlight Investments)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.95
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM33169: Zoning By-law Amendment Application at 301 Dixon Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 117779 WET 02 OZ at 301 Dixon Rd: A Zoning By-law Amendment application to facilitate an infill development to construct an 8-storey residential building with 10,375 square metres of residential gross floor area and 145 dwelling units. The proposed development would be supported by 290 square metres of indoor amenity space, an addi… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Zoning By-law Amendment Application at 301 Dixon Road
Matched fields
address
301 DIXON RD
application_address
301 DIXON RD

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 2

7 lobbied · 115 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 2: 7 lobbied and 115 matched unlobbied applications in 5 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	7	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	115	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 2

9 lobbied · 10 matched