Address · Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
300 Bloor St W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Location
- 43.66726, -79.40188
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
14These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Top 8Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 8 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Office of Councillor Joe Cressy | Councillor staff | 49 | 9 | 25 July 2018 |
| Office of Councillor Cressy Ward 20 | Councillor staff | 10 | 3 | 26 July 2018 |
| Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina | Member of council | 9 | 9 | 26 July 2018 |
| Councillor Layton | Councillor staff | 5 | 1 | 16 July 2019 |
| Ward 11 University-Rosedale | Member of council | 3 | 2 | 28 January 2019 |
| Dianne Saxe | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 19 October 2023 |
| Affordable Housing Office | City staff | 1 | 0 | 10 May 2018 |
| Dianne Saxe | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 26 October 2023 |
All registrations· 14 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM32718 | Collecdev Markee Limited Partnership | 300 Bloor St. W | Planning and Development Application; Site Plan | 17 December 2021 – 30 June 2026 | 3 |
| SM31280 | Collecdev Inc. | 300 Bloor St. W | Planning and Development, Heritage; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 24 February 2021 – 24 February 2022 | 0 |
| SM27391 | Northrop Development Incorporated | 300 Bloor Street West | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 22 January 2019 – 22 January 2020 | 1 |
| SM27377 | Northrop Developments Inc. | 300 Bloor St. W. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 18 January 2019 – 18 January 2020 | 7 |
| SM26298 | 300 Bloor West GP Inc. | 300 Bloor Street West | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 4 June 2018 – 6 June 2019 | 12 |
| SM26299 | 300 Bloor West GP Inc. | 300 Bloor Street West | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 4 June 2018 – 6 June 2019 | 1 |
| SM25759 | Collecdev Inc. | 300 Bloor Street West | Planning and Development, Heritage; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 19 January 2018 – 30 June 2020 | 0 |
| SM25550 | Northrop Development Incorporated | 300 Bloor Street West | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 18 January 2018 – 4 June 2018 | 21 |
| SM25459 | Northrop Development Incorporated | 300 Bloor Street West | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 19 December 2017 – 4 June 2018 | 1 |
| SM25038 | Northrop Development Incorporated | 300 Bloor Street West. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 15 September 2017 – 15 March 2021 | 1 |
| SM25034 | Northrop Development Incorporated | 300 Bloor Street West | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 12 September 2017 – 28 February 2020 | 0 |
| SM24685 | Northrop Development Incorporated | 300 Bloor Street West | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 8 June 2017 – 4 June 2018 | 31 |
| SM16097 | Northrup Developments Inc. | 300 Bloor Street West | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 28 March 2011 – 6 May 2015 | 1 |
| SM16098 | Northrup Developments Inc. | 300 Bloor Street West | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 28 March 2011 – 26 March 2019 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 17 March 2026Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 26 130612 STE 11 CDDraft Plan Approved · Approved
- Submitted 19 October 2021Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0100/21TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 4 March 2020Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 20 122085 STE 11 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 27 December 2017Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 17 279303 STE 20 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26 130612 STE 11 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 17 March 2026 | Draft Plan Approved Approved |
| B0100/21TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 19 October 2021 | Closed Approved |
| 20 122085 STE 11 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 4 March 2020 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 17 279303 STE 20 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 27 December 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
300 Bloor St W · Site Plan Approval (SA)
20 122085 STE 11 SA · submitted 4 March 2020 · Closed · from registration SM32718 (Collecdev Markee Limited Partnership)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.87
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM32718: 300 Bloor St. W - Site Plan (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 122085 STE 11 SA at 300 Bloor St W: Application to permit the redevelopment of the site for a 34-storey (TLAB approved) mixed-use building containing office, retail/café, worship and community, and residential uses (349 dwelling units). The majority of the existing church and the entirety of Pidgeon House would be retained. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 300 Bloor St. W - Site Plan
Matched fields
- address
- 300 BLOOR ST W
- application_address
- 300 BLOOR ST W
300 Bloor St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
17 279303 STE 20 OZ · submitted 27 December 2017 · Closed · from registration SM25038 (Northrop Development Incorporated)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.91
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM25038: ZBA application in support of redevelopment of Bloor Street United Church, 300 Bloor Street West. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 279303 STE 20 OZ at 300 Bloor St W: Zoning By-law Amendment Application to permit the redevelopment of the site for a 29-storey mixed-use building containing office, retail/café, worship and community, and residential uses (249 dwelling units). The majority of the existing church and the entirety of Pidgeon House would be retained. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: ZBA application in support of redevelopment of Bloor Street United Church, 300 Bloor Street West.
Matched fields
- address
- 300 BLOOR ST W
- application_address
- 300 BLOOR ST W
300 Bloor St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
17 279303 STE 20 OZ · submitted 27 December 2017 · Closed · from registration SM25759 (Collecdev Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.74
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25759: 300 Bloor Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 279303 STE 20 OZ at 300 Bloor St W: Zoning By-law Amendment Application to permit the redevelopment of the site for a 29-storey mixed-use building containing office, retail/café, worship and community, and residential uses (249 dwelling units). The majority of the existing church and the entirety of Pidgeon House would be retained. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 300 Bloor Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 300 BLOOR ST W
- application_address
- 300 BLOOR ST W
300 Bloor St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
17 279303 STE 20 OZ · submitted 27 December 2017 · Closed · from registration SM27377 (Northrop Developments Inc.)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.91
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM27377: Community Engagement Services in connection with redevelopment of 300 Bloor St. W. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 279303 STE 20 OZ at 300 Bloor St W: Zoning By-law Amendment Application to permit the redevelopment of the site for a 29-storey mixed-use building containing office, retail/café, worship and community, and residential uses (249 dwelling units). The majority of the existing church and the entirety of Pidgeon House would be retained. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Community Engagement Services in connection with redevelopment of 300 Bloor St. W.
Matched fields
- address
- 300 BLOOR ST W
- application_address
- 300 BLOOR ST W
300 Bloor St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
17 279303 STE 20 OZ · submitted 27 December 2017 · Closed · from registration SM27391 (Northrop Development Incorporated)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM27391: 300 Bloor Street West, City of Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 279303 STE 20 OZ at 300 Bloor St W: Zoning By-law Amendment Application to permit the redevelopment of the site for a 29-storey mixed-use building containing office, retail/café, worship and community, and residential uses (249 dwelling units). The majority of the existing church and the entirety of Pidgeon House would be retained. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 300 Bloor Street West, City of Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 300 BLOOR ST W
- application_address
- 300 BLOOR ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 11
4 lobbied · 10 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 10 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 11
3 lobbied · 25 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 3 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 25 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11
46 lobbied · 113 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 46 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 9% | 0.09 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 113 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.02 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11
69 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 69 | — | 100% (n=10) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.