300 Bartor Rd

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 1; 1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations: 0
Applications at this address: 2; 2 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 7 · Anthony Perruzza
Location: 43.72931, -79.52709
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

SFR Toronto, LPSM30556 · 14 September 20200

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

No communications recorded.

All registrations· 1 row

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM30556	SFR Toronto, LP	300 Bartor Road	Planning and Development Application, Site Plan; Planning and Development Application, Minor Varian…	14 September 2020 – 31 December 2026	0

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 11 March 2022Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0229/22EYKClosed · Approved
Submitted 27 January 2022Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 22 108249 WET 07 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 2 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
A0229/22EYK Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	11 March 2022	Closed Approved
22 108249 WET 07 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	27 January 2022	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

300 Bartor Rd · Minor variance (MV)
A0229/22EYK · submitted 11 March 2022 · Closed · from registration SM30556 (SFR Toronto, LP)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30556: Proposed development at 300 Bartor Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0229/22EYK at 300 Bartor Rd: To construct a two-storey addition along the south side of the existing dwelling. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Proposed development at 300 Bartor Road
Matched fields
address
300 BARTOR RD
application_address
300 BARTOR RD
300 Bartor Rd · Site Plan Approval (SA)
22 108249 WET 07 SA · submitted 27 January 2022 · Closed · from registration SM30556 (SFR Toronto, LP)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.70
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30556: Proposed development at 300 Bartor Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 108249 WET 07 SA at 300 Bartor Rd: Proposed development of a new two storey addition of 6,057 square metres to the south wall of the existing building. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Proposed development at 300 Bartor Road
Matched fields
address
300 BARTOR RD
application_address
300 BARTOR RD

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 7

1 lobbied · 17 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 7: 1 lobbied and 17 matched unlobbied applications in 1 matched stratum
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	1	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	17	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 7

5 lobbied · 28 matched