Address · Ward 5 · Frances Nunziata
30 Weston Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 5 · Frances Nunziata
- Location
- 43.67285, -79.46841
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 11 York South-Weston | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 10 September 2013 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM19652 | Trinity Development Group Inc. | 30 Weston Road | Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance | 3 September 2013 – 31 December 2013 | 1 |
| SM12949 | Riotrin Properties (Weston) Inc. | 30 Weston Road | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 3 November 2008 – 5 May 2014 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 6 October 2010Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 10 273094 WET 11 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 2 December 2008Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 08 226555 WET 11 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 25 June 2008Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 08 174968 WET 11 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 273094 WET 11 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 6 October 2010 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 08 226555 WET 11 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 2 December 2008 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 08 174968 WET 11 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 25 June 2008 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
101 Gunns Rd · Site Plan Approval (SA)
08 226555 WET 11 SA · submitted 2 December 2008 · Closed · from registration SM12949 (Riotrin Properties (Weston) Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.77
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM12949: Planning and Development, Combined Application, Zoning By-law and Site Plan for 30 Weston Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 226555 WET 11 SA at 101 Gunns Rd: Proposal to demolish the existing buildings on the property and to construct a retail/service commercial centre, which includes a combination of small and mid-sized retailers in addition to a retail warehouse anchor. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning and Development, Combined Application, Zoning By-law and Site Plan for 30 Weston Road
Matched fields
- address
- 30 WESTON RD
- application_address
- 30 WESTON RD
30 Weston Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
08 174968 WET 11 OZ · submitted 25 June 2008 · Closed · from registration SM12949 (Riotrin Properties (Weston) Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.73
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM12949: Planning and Development, Combined Application, Zoning By-law and Site Plan for 30 Weston Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 174968 WET 11 OZ at 30 Weston Rd: Proposal to demolish the existing buildings on the property and to construct a retail/service commercial centre, which includes a combination of small and mid-sized retailers in addition to a retail warehouse anchor. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning and Development, Combined Application, Zoning By-law and Site Plan for 30 Weston Road
Matched fields
- address
- 30 WESTON RD
- application_address
- 30 WESTON RD
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 5
12 lobbied · 17 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 12 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 5
15 lobbied · 40 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 15 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 40 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.