Address · Ward 13 · Chris Moise

30 Bond St

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 3; 2 client organisations
Communications on those registrations: 3; 3 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 4; No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 13 · Chris Moise
Location: 43.65365, -79.37768
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Unity Health TorontoSM36334 · 6 February 20252
St. Michael's HospitalSM22524 · 24 November 20151
St. Michael's HospitalSM11670 · 1 May 20080

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale1
Chris Moise1
Paula Fletcher1

Data table· 3 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale	Member of council	1	1	24 November 2015
Chris Moise	Councillor staff	1	1	14 April 2025
Paula Fletcher	Member of council	1	1	11 July 2025

All registrations· 3 rows

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM36334	Unity Health Toronto	30 Bond Street	Planning and Development Application; Planning and Development, Combined Application	6 February 2025 – 31 December 2026	2
SM22524	St. Michael's Hospital	30 Bond Street	Planning and Development, Combined Application	24 November 2015 – 25 August 2026	1
SM11670	St. Michael's Hospital	30 Bond Street	Planning Applications - Site Plan, Minor Variance	1 May 2008	0

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 14 November 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0841/25TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 2 May 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 148963 STE 27 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 14 February 2013Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 13 120234 STE 27 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 29 May 2009Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 09 143528 STE 27 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 4 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
A0841/25TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	14 November 2025	Closed Approved
16 148963 STE 27 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	2 May 2016	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
13 120234 STE 27 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	14 February 2013	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
09 143528 STE 27 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	29 May 2009	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 13

5 lobbied · 76 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 13: 5 lobbied and 76 matched unlobbied applications in 2 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	5	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	76	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13

56 lobbied · 128 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=5
Matched, unlobbied100% n=8

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied7%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13: 56 lobbied and 128 matched unlobbied applications in 32 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	56	—	100% (n=5)	0%	7%	0.16
Matched, unlobbied	128	—	100% (n=8)	0%	2%	0.01

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.