lobbyTO

Address · Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin

299 Roehampton Ave

Registrations naming this address
6
1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations
0
Applications at this address
1
No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items
0
Items naming this address

About this address

Ward
Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
Location
43.70953, -79.38975
How this address was located
Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

6

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

No communications recorded.

All registrations· 6 rows
RegistrationClientAs writtenSubject matterDatesCommunications
SM37469K&G Apartment Holdings Inc.299 Roehampton AvenueAffordable Housing; Planning and Development, Rental Housing Demolition or Conversion; Planning and…2 March 2026 – 31 December 20260
SM36547K&G Apartment Holdings Inc.299 Roehampton AvenuePlanning and Development, Rental Housing Demolition or Conversion; Planning and Development Applica…15 April 2025 – 31 December 20250
SM16534K&G Apartment Holdings Inc.299 Roehampton AvenuePlanning and Development Application, Site Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-la…3 June 2011 – 30 December 20110
SM11158K&G Apartment Holdings Inc.299 Roehampton AvenuePlanning Applications: Official Plan,zoning by-law, site plan,rental housing demolition21 February 2008 – 13 January 20100
SM11169K&G Apartment Holdings Inc.299 Roehampton AvenuePlanning Application: Official Plan, Zoning by-law21 February 2008 – 14 September 20110
SM10827K&G Apartment Holdings Inc.299 Roehampton Ave.subject matter no. 1: planning application - zoning, by laws13 February 20080

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

1
Data table· 1 row
ApplicationTypeSubmittedStatus
25 187440 NNY 15 OZ
Development application
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)3 July 2025Appeal Received
In progress

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 15

20 lobbied · 36 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=4
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied15%
  • Matched, unlobbied30%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=78
  • Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied12%
  • Matched, unlobbied14%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 15: 20 lobbied and 36 matched unlobbied applications in 15 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied20—100% (n=4)0%15%0.05
Matched, unlobbied36—100% (n=6)0%30%0.01
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied571—100% (n=78)0%12%0.08
Matched, unlobbied760—96% (n=78)4%14%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.