Address · Ward 12 · Josh Matlow

298 Lonsdale Rd

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 1; 1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations: 4; 2 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 1; 1 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
Location: 43.69035, -79.40932
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

The Bishop Strachan SchoolSM19430 · 17 June 20134

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Ward 222
Ward 22 St. Paul's2

Data table· 2 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 22	Councillor staff	2	2	17 June 2013
Ward 22 St. Paul's	Member of council	2	1	10 September 2013

All registrations· 1 row

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM19430	The Bishop Strachan School	298 Lonsdale Road	Planning and Development Application, Site Plan; Planning and Development Application, Minor Varian…	17 June 2013 – 17 May 2014	4

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 23 September 2013Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 13 240358 STE 22 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 1 row

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
13 240358 STE 22 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	23 September 2013	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

298 Lonsdale Rd · Site Plan Approval (SA)
13 240358 STE 22 SA · submitted 23 September 2013 · Closed · from registration SM19430 (The Bishop Strachan School)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19430: application for renovation and addition at The Bishop Strachan School, 298 Lonsdale Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 240358 STE 22 SA at 298 Lonsdale Rd: Proposal for site plan approval for an addition and renovations on the north side of the existing Bishop Strachan School. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: application for renovation and addition at The Bishop Strachan School, 298 Lonsdale Road
Matched fields
address
298 LONSDALE RD
application_address
298 LONSDALE RD

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12

32 lobbied · 72 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=4
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied3%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12: 32 lobbied and 72 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	32	—	100% (n=4)	0%	3%	0.00
Matched, unlobbied	72	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.05

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.