Address · Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
29 Parkcrest Dr
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
- Location
- 43.73612, -79.21825
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gary Crawford | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 11 July 2023 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM34616 | Parkcrest Holdings Inc. | 29 Parkcrest Drive | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 5 July 2023 – 15 January 2024 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 2 July 2025Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 25 187032 ESC 20 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 12 October 2022Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 22 216036 ESC 20 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25 187032 ESC 20 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 2 July 2025 | Under Review In progress |
| 22 216036 ESC 20 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 12 October 2022 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
27 Parkcrest Dr · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
22 216036 ESC 20 OZ · submitted 12 October 2022 · Closed · from registration SM34615 (Parkcrest Holdings Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM34615: For site located at 27 & 29 Parkcrest Drive - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment applications. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 216036 ESC 20 OZ at 27 Parkcrest Dr: REVISED PROPOSAL- The revised proposal which is the subject of the current resubmission consists of 112 townhouse units. Proposal to permit the comprehensive redevelopment of the subject site with five blocks of stacked, back to back townhouse dwelling units. The proposed townhouse blocks are orien… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: For site located at 27 & 29 Parkcrest Drive - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment applications.
Matched fields
- address
- 27&29 PARKCREST DR
- application_address
- 27 PARKCREST DR
27 Parkcrest Dr · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
22 216036 ESC 20 OZ · submitted 12 October 2022 · Closed · from registration SM34616 (Parkcrest Holdings Inc.)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.91
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM34616: For proposed redevelopment located at 27 & 29 Parkcrest Drive - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment applications. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 216036 ESC 20 OZ at 27 Parkcrest Dr: REVISED PROPOSAL- The revised proposal which is the subject of the current resubmission consists of 112 townhouse units. Proposal to permit the comprehensive redevelopment of the subject site with five blocks of stacked, back to back townhouse dwelling units. The proposed townhouse blocks are orien… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: For proposed redevelopment located at 27 & 29 Parkcrest Drive - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment applications.
Matched fields
- address
- 27&29 PARKCREST DR
- application_address
- 27 PARKCREST DR
27 Parkcrest Dr · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
22 216036 ESC 20 OZ · submitted 12 October 2022 · Closed · from registration SM34618 (Regency Property Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM34618: Our Real Estate Development Company - Regency Property Inc. at the development of 27 & 29 Parkcrest Drive in Scarborough. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 216036 ESC 20 OZ at 27 Parkcrest Dr: REVISED PROPOSAL- The revised proposal which is the subject of the current resubmission consists of 112 townhouse units. Proposal to permit the comprehensive redevelopment of the subject site with five blocks of stacked, back to back townhouse dwelling units. The proposed townhouse blocks are orien… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Our Real Estate Development Company - Regency Property Inc. at the development of 27 & 29 Parkcrest Drive in Scarborough.
Matched fields
- address
- 27&29 PARKCREST DR
- application_address
- 27 PARKCREST DR
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 20
11 lobbied · 34 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 11 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 34 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 20
13 lobbied · 19 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 19 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.