Address · Ward 6 · James Pasternak
2808 Keele St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 6 · James Pasternak
- Location
- 43.72905, -79.48293
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 1 April 2022Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 22 129777 NNY 06 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 9 April 2021Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 21 138295 NNY 06 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 129777 NNY 06 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 1 April 2022 | Under Review In progress |
| 21 138295 NNY 06 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 9 April 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
2808 Keele St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
22 129777 NNY 06 SA · submitted 1 April 2022 · Under Review · from registration SM33237 (Davpart Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM33237: 2808-2810 Keele Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 129777 NNY 06 SA at 2808 Keele St: April 13, 2022 - Proposal for a 13-storey residential building fronting Keele Street with a total residential gross floor area of 24,387 square metres, a total of 337 dwelling units, and a density of 3.66 times the lot area. April 18, 2022 - Additional documents circulated (Architectural Plans). (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 2808-2810 Keele Street
Matched fields
- address
- 2808-2810 KEELE ST
- application_address
- 2808 KEELE ST
2808 Keele St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
21 138295 NNY 06 OZ · submitted 9 April 2021 · Closed · from registration SM33237 (Davpart Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM33237: 2808-2810 Keele Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 138295 NNY 06 OZ at 2808 Keele St: Zoning bylaw Amendment application to permit the proposal for a 12-storey mixed use building on the south-east portion and a 3-storey semi-detached building in the south-west corner of the Subject Lands. The proposed residential building will front onto Keele Street. The proposal would be a total r… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 2808-2810 Keele Street
Matched fields
- address
- 2808-2810 KEELE ST
- application_address
- 2808 KEELE ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 6
17 lobbied · 41 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 41 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 6
13 lobbied · 16 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.