Address · Ward 8 · Mike Colle

2788 Bathurst St

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 1; 1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations: 3; 2 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 6; 1 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 8 · Mike Colle
Location: 43.71195, -79.42831
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Lanterra DevelopmentsSM25778 · 1 March 20183

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Ward 15 Eglinton-Lawrence2
Ward 16 Eglinton-Lawrence1

Data table· 2 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 15 Eglinton-Lawrence	Member of council	2	2	5 March 2018
Ward 16 Eglinton-Lawrence	Member of council	1	1	5 April 2018

All registrations· 1 row

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM25778	Lanterra Developments	2788 Bathurst Street	Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan	1 March 2018 – 31 July 2027	3

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 29 July 2025Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 25 201918 NNY 08 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 20 May 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0228/25NYClosed · Approved
Submitted 27 February 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0086/25NYClosed · Approved
Submitted 6 February 2025Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 25 113630 NNY 08 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 9 July 2020Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 20 165519 NNY 08 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 4 May 2018Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 18 153780 NNY 15 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 6 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
25 201918 NNY 08 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	29 July 2025	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
A0228/25NY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	20 May 2025	Closed Approved
A0086/25NY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	27 February 2025	Closed Approved
25 113630 NNY 08 CD Development application	Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)	6 February 2025	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
20 165519 NNY 08 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	9 July 2020	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
18 153780 NNY 15 OZ Development application	Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)	4 May 2018	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

2788 Bathurst St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
20 165519 NNY 08 SA · submitted 9 July 2020 · Closed · from registration SM25778 (Lanterra Developments)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.92
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM25778: 2788 Bathurst Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 165519 NNY 08 SA at 2788 Bathurst St: Development proposal comprising of a 9 storey mixed-use building and an on-site public park. Total GFA proposed: 24, 160 square metres including 20,833 sqaure metres residential, 2,500 square metres hotel and 827 square metres retail. 113 residential units are proposed with 222 vehicle parking spac… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 2788 Bathurst Street
Matched fields
address
2788 BATHURST ST
application_address
2788 BATHURST ST

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 8

25 lobbied · 69 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=2

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied8%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 8: 25 lobbied and 69 matched unlobbied applications in 16 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	25	—	100% (n=3)	0%	8%	0.00
Matched, unlobbied	69	—	100% (n=2)	0%	4%	0.00

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Committee of Adjustment applications

Minor variance (MV), Ward 8

7 lobbied · 357 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 8: 7 lobbied and 357 matched unlobbied applications in 6 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	7	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	357	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 8

1 lobbied · 2 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 4 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 8: 1 lobbied and 2 matched unlobbied applications in 1 matched stratum
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	1	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	2	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8

33 lobbied · 57 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=3

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied26%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8: 33 lobbied and 57 matched unlobbied applications in 22 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	33	—	100% (n=3)	0%	12%	0.00
Matched, unlobbied	57	—	100% (n=3)	0%	26%	0.03

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

About this address

Registrations that mention this address

Registrations by communications

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Linked lobbying registrations

Source records

Matched text

Matched fields

Council and committee items naming this address

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 8

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

Committee of Adjustment applications

Minor variance (MV), Ward 8

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

Development applications

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 8

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

Development applications

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide