Address · Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
264 St George St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Location
- 43.67321, -79.40271
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
1- Submitted 8 January 2025Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 25 102375 STE 11 OZOMB Appeal · In progress
Data table· 1 row
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25 102375 STE 11 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 8 January 2025 | OMB Appeal In progress |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
262 St George St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
25 102375 STE 11 OZ · submitted 8 January 2025 · OMB Appeal · from registration SM36201 (JCD Property Ltd.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM36201: Development application for redevelopment at 262-266 St George Street, Toronto. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 25 102375 STE 11 OZ at 262 St George St: Appealed on April 24, 2026.Combined Official Plan & Zoning By-law Amendment for an 18-storey building containing 121 dwelling units, and the adaptive re-use of the heritage listed buildings at 262 and 264 St. George Street. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development application for redevelopment at 262-266 St George Street, Toronto.
Matched fields
- address
- 262-266 ST GEORGE ST
- application_address
- 262 ST GEORGE ST
262 St George St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
25 102375 STE 11 OZ · submitted 8 January 2025 · OMB Appeal · from registration SM36202 (JCD Property Ltd.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM36202: Development application for redevelopment at 262-266 St George Street, Toronto. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 25 102375 STE 11 OZ at 262 St George St: Appealed on April 24, 2026.Combined Official Plan & Zoning By-law Amendment for an 18-storey building containing 121 dwelling units, and the adaptive re-use of the heritage listed buildings at 262 and 264 St. George Street. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development application for redevelopment at 262-266 St George Street, Toronto.
Matched fields
- address
- 262-266 ST GEORGE ST
- application_address
- 262 ST GEORGE ST
262 St George St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
25 102375 STE 11 OZ · submitted 8 January 2025 · OMB Appeal · from registration SM37573 (JCD Property Ltd.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.87
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM37573: Development application for redevelopment at 262-266 St George Street, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 25 102375 STE 11 OZ at 262 St George St: Appealed on April 24, 2026.Combined Official Plan & Zoning By-law Amendment for an 18-storey building containing 121 dwelling units, and the adaptive re-use of the heritage listed buildings at 262 and 264 St. George Street. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development application for redevelopment at 262-266 St George Street, Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 262-266 ST GEORGE ST
- application_address
- 262 ST GEORGE ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11
69 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 69 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.