Address · Ward 13 · Chris Moise
260 Wellesley St E
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Location
- 43.66907, -79.37172
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 3 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 13 Toronto Centre | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 10 February 2022 |
| Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 4 May 2017 |
| Chris Moise | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 3 April 2023 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM33052 | Greatwise Development Corporation | 260 Wellesley Street East | Planning and Development Application; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 10 February 2022 – 31 December 2023 | 3 |
| SM24230 | Greatwise Developments | 260 Wellesley St. E. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 22 March 2017 – 27 March 2024 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
1- Submitted 24 April 2018Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 18 148195 STE 28 OZCouncil Approved · Approved
Data table· 1 row
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18 148195 STE 28 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 24 April 2018 | Council Approved Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
238 Wellesley St E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
18 148195 STE 28 OZ · submitted 24 April 2018 · Council Approved · from registration SM24230 (Greatwise Developments)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM24230: Revitalization of St. James Town - 77 Howard St., 650 Parliament St., 280 Wellesley St. E. & 240 & 260 Wellesley St. E. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 148195 STE 28 OZ at 238 Wellesley St E: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment applications to permit three new buildings on the lands, comprising a 58-storey mixed-use condominium building with 4,060 square metres of non-residential uses in the lower floors and 741 dwelling units, a 21-storey purpose built rental building with 287 dw… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Revitalization of St. James Town - 77 Howard St., 650 Parliament St., 280 Wellesley St. E. & 240 & 260 Wellesley St. E.
Matched fields
- address
- 77 HOWARD ST
- application_address
- 77 HOWARD ST
238 Wellesley St E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
18 148195 STE 28 OZ · submitted 24 April 2018 · Council Approved · from registration SM26510 (Greatwise)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.77
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM26510: 238, 240,280 Wellesley St. East and 650 Parliament Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 148195 STE 28 OZ at 238 Wellesley St E: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment applications to permit three new buildings on the lands, comprising a 58-storey mixed-use condominium building with 4,060 square metres of non-residential uses in the lower floors and 741 dwelling units, a 21-storey purpose built rental building with 287 dw… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 238, 240,280 Wellesley St. East and 650 Parliament Street
Matched fields
- address
- 280 WELLESLEY ST E
- application_address
- 280 WELLESLEY ST E
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13
82 lobbied · 96 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 82 | — | 100% (n=13) | 0% | 11% | 0.15 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 96 | — | 90% (n=14) | 10% | 16% | 0.08 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.