Address · Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
260 Brimley Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
- Location
- 43.72651, -79.24737
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
3These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 4 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Councillor Gary Crawford | Councillor staff | 5 | 1 | 11 January 2022 |
| Ward 36 Scarborough Southwest | Member of council | 4 | 2 | 17 September 2015 |
| Ward 36 | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 11 September 2015 |
| Ward 20 Scarborough Southwest | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 11 January 2022 |
All registrations· 3 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM29663 | Chilocco Building Corporation | 260 Brimley Road | Planning and Development Application, Plan of Subdivision; Planning and Development Application, Si… | 21 January 2020 – 24 July 2024 | 6 |
| SM22212 | Lifetime Developments | 260 Brimley Road | Planning and Development Application, Plan of Subdivision | 8 September 2015 – 8 September 2016 | 4 |
| SM21883 | Lifetime Developments | 260 Brimley Road | Planning and Development Application, Plan of Subdivision | 29 May 2015 – 31 December 2017 | 2 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 29 July 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0165/25SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 18 December 2020Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 20 230362 ESC 20 OZOMB Appeal · In progress
- Submitted 18 December 2020Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 20 230363 ESC 20 SBUnder Review · In progress
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0165/25SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 29 July 2025 | Closed Approved |
| 20 230362 ESC 20 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 18 December 2020 | OMB Appeal In progress |
| 20 230363 ESC 20 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 18 December 2020 | Under Review In progress |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
180 Brimley Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
20 230362 ESC 20 OZ · submitted 18 December 2020 · OMB Appeal · from registration SM29663 (Chilocco Building Corporation)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM29663: Proposed development (rezoning, plan of subdivision, site plan) at 260 Brimley Road, Scarborough Ontario M1M 3H8 (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 230362 ESC 20 OZ at 180 Brimley Rd: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments to facilitate a proposed plan of subdivision having a total area of 15.625 ha . The subdivision proposes new public roads, along with various blocks for 384 townhouse units (single block and back to back) along with future development blocks for an estimat… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Proposed development (rezoning, plan of subdivision, site plan) at 260 Brimley Road, Scarborough Ontario M1M 3H8
Matched fields
- address
- 260 BRIMLEY RD
- application_address
- 260 BRIMLEY RD
180 Brimley Rd · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
20 230363 ESC 20 SB · submitted 18 December 2020 · Under Review · from registration SM29663 (Chilocco Building Corporation)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM29663: Proposed development (rezoning, plan of subdivision, site plan) at 260 Brimley Road, Scarborough Ontario M1M 3H8 (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 230363 ESC 20 SB at 180 Brimley Rd: Proposed plan of subdivision having a total area of 15.625 ha . The subdivision proposes new public roads, along with various blocks for on-street townhouses, back to back townhouses along with future development blocks, parks, buffer and road widenings. A total of 384 townhouse units are proposed … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Proposed development (rezoning, plan of subdivision, site plan) at 260 Brimley Road, Scarborough Ontario M1M 3H8
Matched fields
- address
- 260 BRIMLEY RD
- application_address
- 260 BRIMLEY RD
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 20
9 lobbied · 295 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 9 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 295 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 20
13 lobbied · 19 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 19 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 20
1 lobbied · 1 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.