Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
255 Wellington St W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.64479, -79.39057
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 3 May 2012 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM18075 | Easton's Group of Hotels | 255 Wellington Street West | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Pla… | 3 May 2012 – 3 May 2013 | 1 |
| SM18025 | Steve Gupta | 255 Wellington St West | Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance | 19 April 2012 – 1 July 2014 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 8 December 2020Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1118/20TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 13 December 2016Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1221/16TEYClosed · Refused
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A1118/20TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 8 December 2020 | Closed Approved |
| A1221/16TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 13 December 2016 | Closed Refused |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 10
20 lobbied · 261 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | 136 | 100% (n=20) | 0% | 0% | 14% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 261 | 138 | 93% (n=214) | 7% | 5% | 18% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.