Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik

255 Bremner Blvd

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 10; 4 client organisations
Communications on those registrations: 29; 9 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 3; No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
Location: 43.64173, -79.38538
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Top 8

Cineplex Inc.SM28085 · 30 April 20199
Cineplex Inc.SM22771 · 9 February 20168
State Building GroupSM22745 · 2 February 20166
Cineplex Inc.SM23443 · 12 August 20162
John Street Roundhouse Development Corp.SM22915 · 7 March 20162
John Street Roundhouse Development Corp.SM22768 · 10 February 20162
State Building GroupSM16598 · 22 June 20110
State Building GroupSM11518 · 9 April 20080

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Mayor's Office6
Ward 37 Scarborough Centre6
Real Estate4
Mayor4
Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina4
Ward 21 Scarborough Centre2
Economic Development & Culture1
Parks, Forestry & Recreation1

Data table· 9 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Mayor's Office	Councillor staff	6	6	23 August 2016
Ward 37 Scarborough Centre	Member of council	6	6	7 March 2016
Real Estate	City staff	4	4	8 May 2019
Mayor	Member of council	4	4	10 February 2016
Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina	Member of council	4	4	7 March 2016
Ward 21 Scarborough Centre	Member of council	2	2	15 May 2020
Economic Development & Culture	City staff	1	1	3 June 2019
Parks, Forestry & Recreation	City staff	1	1	3 June 2019
Real Estate Services	City staff	1	1	3 June 2019

All registrations· 10 rows

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM28085	Cineplex Inc.	255 Bremner Blvd.	Real Estate / Property (City-owned)	30 April 2019 – 9 December 2020	9
SM23443	Cineplex Inc.	255 Bremner Blvd	Attractions / Tourism; Recreation	12 August 2016 – 5 January 2017	2
SM22915	John Street Roundhouse Development Corp.	255 Bremner Blvd	Economic Development; Real Estate / Property (City-owned)	7 March 2016 – 31 December 2026	2
SM22768	John Street Roundhouse Development Corp.	255 Bremner Boulevard	Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law	10 February 2016 – 10 February 2016	2
SM22771	Cineplex Inc.	255 BREMNER BLVD	Attractions / Tourism; Recreation	9 February 2016 – 25 January 2017	8
SM22745	State Building Group	255 Bremner Blvd.	Real Estate / Property (City-owned)	2 February 2016 – 24 April 2018	6
SM16598	State Building Group	255 Bremner Blvd	Real Estate / Property (City-owned)	22 June 2011 – 28 August 2013	0
SM11518	State Building Group	255 Bremner Blvd	Real Estate Property-Planning Application- zoning,heritage, signs.	9 April 2008 – 31 May 2011	0
SM11355	Steam Whistle Brewing	255 Bremner Boulevard.	Signs	7 March 2008 – 9 March 2009	0
SM11346	Steam Whistle Brewing	255 Bremner Boulevard.	Signs	6 March 2008 – 6 March 2009	0

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 18 September 2023Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0810/23TEYApproved with Conditions · Approved
Submitted 21 December 2018Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 18 271208 STE 10 SAUnder Review · In progress
Submitted 29 June 2011Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 11 229840 STE 20 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 3 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
A0810/23TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	18 September 2023	Approved with Conditions Approved
18 271208 STE 10 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	21 December 2018	Under Review In progress
11 229840 STE 20 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	29 June 2011	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 10

20 lobbied · 261 matched

Median days

Lobbied136
Matched, unlobbied138

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=20
Matched, unlobbied93% n=214

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied7%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied5%

Objection rate

Lobbied14%
Matched, unlobbied18%

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 10: 20 lobbied and 261 matched unlobbied applications in 8 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	20	136	100% (n=20)	0%	0%	14%
Matched, unlobbied	261	138	93% (n=214)	7%	5%	18%

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10

66 lobbied · 165 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=5
Matched, unlobbied100% n=11

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied3%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10: 66 lobbied and 165 matched unlobbied applications in 37 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	66	—	100% (n=5)	0%	3%	0.05
Matched, unlobbied	165	—	100% (n=11)	0%	2%	0.04

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.