Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
254 Adelaide St W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.64829, -79.38928
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 5 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 10 Spadina-Fort York | Member of council | 9 | 5 | 23 October 2019 |
| CreateTO | City staff | 3 | 3 | 11 September 2019 |
| Office of Councillor Cressy | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 6 October 2019 |
| Office of the Mayor | Councillor staff | 2 | 1 | 7 September 2019 |
| Ward 9 Davenport | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 29 November 2019 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM27916 | Adelaide-Nelson Residences LP | 254 Adelaide Street West | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 26 March 2019 – 8 December 2019 | 7 |
| SM27395 | CentreCourt | 254 Adelaide Street West | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 23 January 2019 – 31 December 2022 | 10 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
1- Submitted 17 December 2021Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 21 249716 STE 10 OZCouncil Approved · Approved
Data table· 1 row
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 249716 STE 10 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 17 December 2021 | Council Approved Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.