Address · Ward 17 · Shelley Carroll
2500 Don Mills Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 17 · Shelley Carroll
- Location
- 43.77523, -79.34774
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 3 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shelley Carroll | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 14 August 2024 |
| Councillor Shelley Carroll | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 24 June 2020 |
| Shelley Carroll | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 12 December 2023 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM32516 | Marlin Spring Developments | 2500 Don Mills Rd | Planning and Development Application | 1 November 2021 – 31 December 2025 | 3 |
| SM30260 | Macs Convenience Stores Inc. | 2500 Don Mills Rd | Planning and Development; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Develop… | 23 June 2020 – 23 June 2021 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 19 April 2022Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 22 135741 NNY 17 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 19 April 2022Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 22 135742 NNY 17 OZCouncil Approved · Approved
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 135741 NNY 17 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 19 April 2022 | Under Review In progress |
| 22 135742 NNY 17 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 19 April 2022 | Council Approved Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
2500 Don Mills Rd · Site Plan Approval (SA)
22 135741 NNY 17 SA · submitted 19 April 2022 · Under Review · from registration SM30260 (Macs Convenience Stores Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30260: Discussion regarding 2500 Don Mills Rd, North York ON M2J 3B3 and proposed Official Plan Amendment No. 476. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 135741 NNY 17 SA at 2500 Don Mills Rd: Proposal for a mixed use development consists of two towers, at 30 and 39 storeys, atop a four-storey podium, and consists of 823 residential units, 50,082 m2 of residential gross floor area (GFA) and 982m2 of retail GFA at grade. The proposal also consists of a three-level parking garage with 327 … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Discussion regarding 2500 Don Mills Rd, North York ON M2J 3B3 and proposed Official Plan Amendment No. 476.
Matched fields
- address
- 2500 DON MILLS RD
- application_address
- 2500 DON MILLS RD
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 17
14 lobbied · 20 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 14 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 20 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 17
13 lobbied · 16 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.