Address · Ward 4 · Gord Perks
2500 Bloor Street West
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 4 · Gord Perks
- Location
- 43.64795, -79.48812
- How this address was located
- Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 2504 BLOOR ST W (4 civic numbers away).
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
4These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 18 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 13 Parkdale-High Park | Member of council | 5 | 5 | 18 April 2011 |
| Ward 29 Toronto-Danforth | Member of council | 4 | 3 | 27 August 2010 |
| Ward 24 Willowdale | Member of council | 3 | 3 | 27 August 2010 |
| Ward 37 Scarborough Centre | Member of council | 3 | 3 | 27 August 2010 |
| Ward 6 Etobicoke-Lakeshore | Member of council | 3 | 3 | 27 August 2010 |
| Ward 10 York Centre | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 26 August 2010 |
| Ward 11 York South-Weston | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 26 August 2010 |
| Ward 16 Eglinton-Lawrence | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 26 August 2010 |
| Ward 5 Etobicoke-Lakeshore | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 27 August 2010 |
| Ward 7 York West | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 26 August 2010 |
| Ward 9 York Centre | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 26 August 2010 |
| Office of Councillor Lindsay Luby Ward 4 | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 27 August 2010 |
| Ward 12 York South-Weston | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 25 August 2010 |
| Ward 17 Davenport | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 25 August 2010 |
| Ward 19 Trinity-Spadina | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 25 August 2010 |
| Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 20 August 2010 |
| Ward 3 Etobicoke Centre | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 25 August 2010 |
| Ward 4 Etobicoke Centre | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 26 August 2010 |
All registrations· 4 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM14947 | Delnova Developments Inc. | 2500 Bloor Street West | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 19 August 2010 – 8 May 2012 | 3 |
| SM14964 | Delnova Developments Inc. | 2500 Bloor Street West | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 19 August 2010 – 19 August 2011 | 1 |
| SM14614 | TRIDEL | 2500 Bloor Street West | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 16 June 2010 – 31 December 2011 | 33 |
| SM11971 | Deltera Inc. | 2500 Bloor Street West | Planning Applications (Zoning By-law, Site Plan) | 15 July 2008 – 31 December 2014 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 8 April 2013Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 13 145964 WET 13 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 28 October 2011Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 11 300932 WET 13 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13 145964 WET 13 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 8 April 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 300932 WET 13 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 28 October 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 4
1 lobbied · 8 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 4
17 lobbied · 33 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 33 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.