lobbyTO

Address · Ward 4 · Gord Perks

2500 Bloor Street West

Registrations naming this address
4
3 client organisations
Communications on those registrations
37
18 offices contacted
Applications at this address
2
No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items
0
Items naming this address

About this address

Ward
Ward 4 · Gord Perks
Location
43.64795, -79.48812
How this address was located
Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 2504 BLOOR ST W (4 civic numbers away).

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

4

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

  • Ward 13 Parkdale-High Park5
  • Ward 29 Toronto-Danforth4
  • Ward 24 Willowdale3
  • Ward 37 Scarborough Centre3
  • Ward 6 Etobicoke-Lakeshore3
  • Ward 10 York Centre2
  • Ward 11 York South-Weston2
  • Ward 16 Eglinton-Lawrence2
Data table· 18 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 13 Parkdale-High ParkMember of council5518 April 2011
Ward 29 Toronto-DanforthMember of council4327 August 2010
Ward 24 WillowdaleMember of council3327 August 2010
Ward 37 Scarborough CentreMember of council3327 August 2010
Ward 6 Etobicoke-LakeshoreMember of council3327 August 2010
Ward 10 York CentreMember of council2226 August 2010
Ward 11 York South-WestonMember of council2226 August 2010
Ward 16 Eglinton-LawrenceMember of council2226 August 2010
Ward 5 Etobicoke-LakeshoreMember of council2227 August 2010
Ward 7 York WestMember of council2226 August 2010
Ward 9 York CentreMember of council2226 August 2010
Office of Councillor Lindsay Luby Ward 4Councillor staff1127 August 2010
Ward 12 York South-WestonMember of council1125 August 2010
Ward 17 DavenportMember of council1125 August 2010
Ward 19 Trinity-SpadinaMember of council1125 August 2010
Ward 28 Toronto Centre-RosedaleMember of council1020 August 2010
Ward 3 Etobicoke CentreMember of council1125 August 2010
Ward 4 Etobicoke CentreMember of council1126 August 2010
All registrations· 4 rows
RegistrationClientAs writtenSubject matterDatesCommunications
SM14947Delnova Developments Inc.2500 Bloor Street WestPlanning and Development Application, Zoning By-law19 August 2010 – 8 May 20123
SM14964Delnova Developments Inc.2500 Bloor Street WestPlanning and Development Application, Zoning By-law19 August 2010 – 19 August 20111
SM14614TRIDEL2500 Bloor Street WestPlanning and Development Application, Zoning By-law16 June 2010 – 31 December 201133
SM11971Deltera Inc.2500 Bloor Street WestPlanning Applications (Zoning By-law, Site Plan)15 July 2008 – 31 December 20140

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

2
Data table· 2 rows
ApplicationTypeSubmittedStatus
13 145964 WET 13 CD
Development application
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)8 April 2013Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
11 300932 WET 13 SA
Development application
Site Plan Approval (SA)28 October 2011Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 4

1 lobbied · 8 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=3
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%
Data table· 4 rows
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 4: 1 lobbied and 8 matched unlobbied applications in 1 matched stratum
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied1Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied8Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied28—100% (n=3)0%0%0.04
Matched, unlobbied95—100% (n=6)0%0%0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 4

17 lobbied · 33 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=63
  • Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%
Data table· 4 rows
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 4: 17 lobbied and 33 matched unlobbied applications in 13 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied17Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied33Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied449—100% (n=63)0%4%0.07
Matched, unlobbied1,236—97% (n=98)3%3%0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.