Address · Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
250 Danforth Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
- Location
- 43.70087, -79.27257
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
5These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 5 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 20 Scarborough Southwest | Member of council | 3 | 2 | 14 March 2022 |
| Ward 35 Scarborough Southwest | Member of council | 2 | 1 | 9 March 2018 |
| Parthi Kandavel | Councillor staff | 2 | 2 | 21 January 2026 |
| Parthi Kandavel | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 21 January 2026 |
| Office of Councillor Michelle Holland, Ward 35 | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 9 March 2018 |
All registrations· 5 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM36380 | Pinemount Developments | 250 Danforth Road | Planning and Development Application; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning… | 20 February 2025 – 26 February 2027 | 4 |
| SM33050 | Gryphon Development | 250 Danforth Rd | Planning and Development; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Develop… | 14 March 2022 – 31 December 2022 | 2 |
| SM32202 | Morrison Group of Companies | 250 Danforth Road | Planning and Development Application; Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning… | 11 August 2021 – 14 February 2023 | 1 |
| SM25781 | Time Development 250 Danforth Inc. | 250 Danforth Road | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 6 March 2018 – 5 March 2019 | 2 |
| SM21622 | Time Development | 250 Danforth Rd. | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 7 April 2015 – 7 April 2016 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
5- Submitted 19 May 2015Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 15 158919 ESC 35 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 19 May 2015Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 15 158925 ESC 35 SAOMB Appeal · In progress
- Submitted 19 May 2015Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 15 158931 ESC 35 SBOMB Appeal · In progress
- Submitted 20 October 2008Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 08 214113 ESC 35 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 20 October 2008Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 08 214119 ESC 35 SBClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 5 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15 158919 ESC 35 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 19 May 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 15 158925 ESC 35 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 19 May 2015 | OMB Appeal In progress |
| 15 158931 ESC 35 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 19 May 2015 | OMB Appeal In progress |
| 08 214113 ESC 35 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 20 October 2008 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 08 214119 ESC 35 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 20 October 2008 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
250 Danforth Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
15 158919 ESC 35 OZ · submitted 19 May 2015 · Closed · from registration SM21622 (Time Development)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM21622: Applications in support of rezoning for 250 Danforth Rd. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 158919 ESC 35 OZ at 250 Danforth Rd: The application proposes the redevelopment of the subject site with a 10-storey (220 units) mixed-use building fronting Danforth Road, the extension of Dairy Drive and Bamblett Drive through the proposed 16.5-metre public street, three blocks of stacked townhouse units (70 units) and 21 regular tow… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Applications in support of rezoning for 250 Danforth Rd.
Matched fields
- address
- 250 DANFORTH RD
- application_address
- 250 DANFORTH RD
250 Danforth Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
15 158919 ESC 35 OZ · submitted 19 May 2015 · Closed · from registration SM25781 (Time Development 250 Danforth Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.77
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25781: Proposed redevelopment of the property at 250 Danforth Road with a mixed-use development. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 158919 ESC 35 OZ at 250 Danforth Rd: The application proposes the redevelopment of the subject site with a 10-storey (220 units) mixed-use building fronting Danforth Road, the extension of Dairy Drive and Bamblett Drive through the proposed 16.5-metre public street, three blocks of stacked townhouse units (70 units) and 21 regular tow… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Proposed redevelopment of the property at 250 Danforth Road with a mixed-use development.
Matched fields
- address
- 250 DANFORTH RD
- application_address
- 250 DANFORTH RD
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 20
13 lobbied · 19 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 19 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 20
11 lobbied · 34 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 11 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 34 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 20
1 lobbied · 1 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.