Address · Ward 23 · Jamaal Myers
25 Glen Watford Dr
- Communications on those registrations
- 0
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 23 · Jamaal Myers
- Location
- 43.78731, -79.27517
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM25634 | KBIJ Corporation | 25 Glen Watford Drive. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Pla… | 12 February 2018 – 7 February 2019 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 12 September 2017Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 17 231670 ESC 41 SBUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 10 June 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 172062 ESC 41 OZOMB Approved · Approved
- Submitted 10 June 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 172094 ESC 41 SAUnder Review · In progress
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17 231670 ESC 41 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 12 September 2017 | Under Review In progress |
| 16 172062 ESC 41 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 10 June 2016 | OMB Approved Approved |
| 16 172094 ESC 41 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 10 June 2016 | Under Review In progress |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
25 Glen Watford Dr · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 172062 ESC 41 OZ · submitted 10 June 2016 · OMB Approved · from registration SM25634 (KBIJ Corporation)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.93
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM25634: Lack of progress with the pending application at 25 Glen Watford Drive. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 172062 ESC 41 OZ at 25 Glen Watford Dr: Proposed 10-storey retirement home/senior's residence containing 119 dwelling units and 130 bed-sitting rooms with at-grade retail and medical office uses and a one-level underground parking garage with 105 parking spaces spaces. New 18.5m wide public street proposed east of Glen Watford Drive endi… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Lack of progress with the pending application at 25 Glen Watford Drive.
Matched fields
- address
- 25 GLEN WATFORD DR
- application_address
- 25 GLEN WATFORD DR
25 Glen Watford Dr · Site Plan Approval (SA)
16 172094 ESC 41 SA · submitted 10 June 2016 · Under Review · from registration SM25634 (KBIJ Corporation)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.92
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM25634: Lack of progress with the pending application at 25 Glen Watford Drive. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 172094 ESC 41 SA at 25 Glen Watford Dr: INACTIVE Proposed 10-storey retirement home containing 249 bed-sitting rooms with at-grade retail uses at a gross density of 3.7 times the lot area and a one-level underground parking garage with 117 parking spaces spaces located on a proposed 18.5m r-o-w (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Lack of progress with the pending application at 25 Glen Watford Drive.
Matched fields
- address
- 25 GLEN WATFORD DR
- application_address
- 25 GLEN WATFORD DR
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 23
2 lobbied · 2 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 23
2 lobbied · 2 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.