Address · Ward 13 · Chris Moise
247 Dundas St E
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Location
- 43.65782, -79.37254
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 18 March 2022Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 22 124213 STE 13 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 18 March 2022Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 22 124214 STE 13 OZCouncil Approved · Approved
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 124213 STE 13 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 18 March 2022 | Under Review In progress |
| 22 124214 STE 13 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 18 March 2022 | Council Approved Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
241 Dundas St E · Site Plan Approval (SA)
22 124213 STE 13 SA · submitted 18 March 2022 · Under Review · from registration SM33930 (Metropia)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.71
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM33930: 219-255 Dundas Street East and 48-50 Pembroke Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 124213 STE 13 SA at 241 Dundas St E: Site Plan Approval application to facilitate the redevelopment of the site for a 49-storey mixed-use building having a non-residential gross floor area of 198.40 square metres, and a residential gross floor area of 41,363.20 square metres. 678 residential dwelling units are proposed, of which, 8 ar… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 219-255 Dundas Street East and 48-50 Pembroke Street
Matched fields
- address
- 219-255 DUNDAS ST E
- application_address
- 255 DUNDAS ST E
239 Dundas St E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
22 124214 STE 13 OZ · submitted 18 March 2022 · Council Approved · from registration SM33930 (Metropia)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM33930: 219-255 Dundas Street East and 48-50 Pembroke Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 124214 STE 13 OZ at 239 Dundas St E: Revised Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment application has been submitted to permit a 52-storey mixed-use building containing 630 dwelling units, 149 square metres of retail GFA and 36,600 square metres of residential GFA,. No vehicle parking is proposed. 699 bicycle parking spaces… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 219-255 Dundas Street East and 48-50 Pembroke Street
Matched fields
- address
- 219-255 DUNDAS ST E
- application_address
- 255 DUNDAS ST E
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13
56 lobbied · 128 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 56 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 7% | 0.16 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 128 | — | 100% (n=8) | 0% | 2% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13
82 lobbied · 96 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 82 | — | 100% (n=13) | 0% | 11% | 0.15 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 96 | — | 90% (n=14) | 10% | 16% | 0.08 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.