Address · Ward 19 · Brad Bradford
2451 Danforth Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 19 · Brad Bradford
- Location
- 43.68743, -79.30415
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brad Bradford | Member of council | 6 | 2 | 16 September 2025 |
| Brad Bradford | Councillor staff | 4 | 4 | 3 July 2024 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM34043 | First capital Realty | 2451 Danforth Avenue. | Planning and Development Application | 16 January 2023 – 31 December 2026 | 10 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
1- Submitted 20 November 2024Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 24 241176 STE 19 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 1 row
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24 241176 STE 19 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 20 November 2024 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
2495 Danforth Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
24 241176 STE 19 OZ · submitted 20 November 2024 · Closed · from registration SM34043 (First capital Realty)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM34043: Planning application for the redevelopment of 2451 Danforth Avenue. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 24 241176 STE 19 OZ at 2495 Danforth Ave: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment to permit a 13 and 29-storey mixed-use building connected by a 2- and 8-storey podium, containing 620 dwelling units, 3,220 square metres of non-residential gross floor area. The proposal includes 354 square metres of publicly accessible open space at-grade… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning application for the redevelopment of 2451 Danforth Avenue.
Matched fields
- address
- 2451 DANFORTH AVE
- application_address
- 2451 DANFORTH AVE
2495 Danforth Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
24 241176 STE 19 OZ · submitted 20 November 2024 · Closed · from registration SM34045 (First capital Realty)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM34045: Official Plan amendment and Zoning by-law amendment for proposed site located at 2451 to 2495 Danforth Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 24 241176 STE 19 OZ at 2495 Danforth Ave: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment to permit a 13 and 29-storey mixed-use building connected by a 2- and 8-storey podium, containing 620 dwelling units, 3,220 square metres of non-residential gross floor area. The proposal includes 354 square metres of publicly accessible open space at-grade… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Official Plan amendment and Zoning by-law amendment for proposed site located at 2451 to 2495 Danforth Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 2495 DANFORTH AVE
- application_address
- 2495 DANFORTH AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 19
7 lobbied · 10 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 7 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 10 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.