Address · Ward 8 · Mike Colle
2430 Yonge St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 8 · Mike Colle
- Location
- 43.71029, -79.39951
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 30 June 2022Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 22 170530 NNY 08 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 21 October 2019Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 19 239154 NNY 08 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 30 June 2017Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 17 190823 NNY 16 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 170530 NNY 08 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 30 June 2022 | Under Review In progress |
| 19 239154 NNY 08 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 21 October 2019 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 17 190823 NNY 16 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 30 June 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
36 Montgomery Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
22 170530 NNY 08 SA · submitted 30 June 2022 · Under Review · from registration SM34118 (First capital Realty)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM34118: Planning applications associated with the redevelopment of 34-70 Montgomery Ave. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 170530 NNY 08 SA at 36 Montgomery Ave: Proposal for a redevelopment of a 27-storey mixed-use building with 314 residential dwelling units, 88 vehicular parking spaces, 146 bicycle parking spaces, and one loading space. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning applications associated with the redevelopment of 34-70 Montgomery Ave.
Matched fields
- address
- 34-70 MONTGOMERY AVE
- application_address
- 34 MONTGOMERY AVE
36 Montgomery Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
22 170530 NNY 08 SA · submitted 30 June 2022 · Under Review · from registration SM34444 (First capital Realty)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.93
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM34444: Planning application associated with the redevelopment of 34-70 Montgomery Avenue. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 170530 NNY 08 SA at 36 Montgomery Ave: Proposal for a redevelopment of a 27-storey mixed-use building with 314 residential dwelling units, 88 vehicular parking spaces, 146 bicycle parking spaces, and one loading space. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning application associated with the redevelopment of 34-70 Montgomery Avenue.
Matched fields
- address
- 34-70 MONTGOMERY AVE
- application_address
- 34 MONTGOMERY AVE
2440 Yonge St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
17 190823 NNY 16 OZ · submitted 30 June 2017 · Closed · from registration SM27570 (First capital Realty)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM27570: Development application at 2400-2444 Yonge Street. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 190823 NNY 16 OZ at 2440 Yonge St: Application to amend the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law to permit two mixed-use towers measuring 27 and 21 storeys in height atop a 6 storey base building and 1,232 square metre parkland dedication. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development application at 2400-2444 Yonge Street.
Matched fields
- address
- 2400-2444 YONGE ST
- application_address
- 2400 YONGE ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 8
25 lobbied · 69 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 25 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 8% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 69 | — | 100% (n=2) | 0% | 4% | 0.00 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8
33 lobbied · 57 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 33 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 12% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 57 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 26% | 0.03 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.