Address

241 Church St

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 1; 1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations: 77; 4 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 6; No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: — (address points for this address fall in more than one ward)
Location: 43.65679, -79.37695
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Graywood Developments Ltd.SM30678 · 1 October 202077

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Chris Moise47
Kristyn Wong-Tam14
Chris Moise11
Ward 13 Toronto Centre5

Data table· 4 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Chris Moise	Councillor staff	47	1	20 August 2025
Kristyn Wong-Tam	Councillor staff	14	0	7 April 2022
Chris Moise	Member of council	11	2	6 May 2025
Ward 13 Toronto Centre	Member of council	5	0	13 April 2022

All registrations· 1 row

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM30678	Graywood Developments Ltd.	241 Church St	Planning and Development; Combined Application	1 October 2020 – 31 December 2026	77

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 21 March 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0289/25TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 21 November 2023Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1063/23TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 25 July 2023Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0674/23TEYClosed · Refused
Submitted 20 December 2022Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 22 241308 STE 13 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 31 August 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 206338 STE 13 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 18 December 2020Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 20 230569 STE 13 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 6 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
A0289/25TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	21 March 2025	Closed Approved
A1063/23TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	21 November 2023	Closed Approved
A0674/23TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	25 July 2023	Closed Refused
22 241308 STE 13 OZ Development application	Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)	20 December 2022	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
21 206338 STE 13 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	31 August 2021	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
20 230569 STE 13 OZ Development application	Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)	18 December 2020	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 13

5 lobbied · 76 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 13: 5 lobbied and 76 matched unlobbied applications in 2 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	5	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	76	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13

83 lobbied · 97 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=10
Matched, unlobbied93% n=14

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied7%

Appeal rate

Lobbied11%
Matched, unlobbied17%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13: 83 lobbied and 97 matched unlobbied applications in 34 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	83	—	100% (n=10)	0%	11%	0.14
Matched, unlobbied	97	1,793	93% (n=14)	7%	17%	0.08

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13

56 lobbied · 128 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=5
Matched, unlobbied100% n=7

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied7%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=61
Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13: 56 lobbied and 128 matched unlobbied applications in 32 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	56	—	100% (n=5)	0%	7%	0.16
Matched, unlobbied	128	—	100% (n=7)	0%	2%	0.01

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=61)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,237	727	97% (n=96)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.