lobbyTO

Address · Ward 2 · Stephen Holyday

240 Markland Dr

Registrations naming this address
10
3 client organisations
Communications on those registrations
40
4 offices contacted
Applications at this address
3
7 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items
0
Items naming this address

About this address

Ward
Ward 2 · Stephen Holyday
Location
43.62913, -79.57875
How this address was located
Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

10

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Top 8

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

  • Ward 3 Etobicoke Centre34
  • Ward 2 Etobicoke Centre4
  • Councillor Peter Leon, Ward 31
  • Ward 4 Etobicoke Centre1
Data table· 4 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 3 Etobicoke CentreMember of council34168 June 2018
Ward 2 Etobicoke CentreMember of council422 February 2022
Councillor Peter Leon, Ward 3Councillor staff1019 December 2013
Ward 4 Etobicoke CentreMember of council1121 April 2017
All registrations· 10 rows
RegistrationClientAs writtenSubject matterDatesCommunications
SM30372Carttera240 Markland DrivePlanning and Development Application; Zoning By-law23 July 2020 – 4 April 20221
SM30322Carttera240 Markland DrivePlanning and Development Application; Zoning By-law14 July 2020 – 30 June 20233
SM24347Windsor Property Management240 Markland Dr.Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law11 April 2017 – 11 May 20181
SM21701S-K Sportswear Limited240 Markland DrivePlanning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan17 April 2015 – 31 July 202021
SM21435Windsor Property Management240 Markland DrivePlanning and Development Application, Zoning By-law13 February 2015 – 12 February 20192
SM18249Windsor Property Management240 Markland DrivePlanning and Development Application, Zoning By-law5 July 2012 – 5 July 20131
SM17357Windsor Property Management240 Markland DrivePlanning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan6 October 2011 – 5 October 20193
SM16988Windsor Property Management240 Markland DrivePlanning and Development Application, Zoning By-law24 August 2011 – 28 December 20181
SM12207Windsor Property Management240 Markland DrivePlanning and Development - Zoning Bylaw Amendment3 September 2008 – 31 December 20197
SM12209Windsor Property Management240 Markland DrivePlanning and Development - Zoning By-law29 August 2008 – 14 September 20120

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

3
Data table· 3 rows
ApplicationTypeSubmittedStatus
26 216899 WET 02 SA
Development application
Site Plan Approval (SA)10 August 2026Under Review
In progress
21 139675 WET 02 SA
Development application
Site Plan Approval (SA)13 April 2021Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
11 209308 WET 03 OZ
Development application
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)2 June 2011Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 2

5 lobbied · 15 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied—
  • Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=61
  • Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%
Data table· 4 rows
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 2: 5 lobbied and 15 matched unlobbied applications in 4 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied5Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied15Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied449—100% (n=61)0%4%0.07
Matched, unlobbied1,23772797% (n=96)3%3%0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 2

9 lobbied · 10 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied1,925
  • Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=64
  • Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied13%
  • Matched, unlobbied13%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 2: 9 lobbied and 10 matched unlobbied applications in 8 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied9Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied10Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied5731,925100% (n=64)0%13%0.08
Matched, unlobbied7631,79398% (n=70)2%13%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.