Address · Ward 19 · Brad Bradford

2343 Queen St E

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 1; 1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations: 4; 1 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 3; No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 19 · Brad Bradford
Location: 43.67202, -79.28957
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Frank BernardoSM35135 · 14 December 20234

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Toronto Building Dept.4

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Toronto Building Dept.	City staff	4	0	12 January 2024

All registrations· 1 row

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM35135	Frank Bernardo	2343 Queen St. E.	Planning and Development Application; Site Plan	14 December 2023 – 16 January 2024	4

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 10 March 2023Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0248/23TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 7 February 2022Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 22 111612 STE 19 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 18 February 2021Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application COA-4881998Application Received · In progress

Data table· 3 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
A0248/23TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	10 March 2023	Closed Approved
22 111612 STE 19 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	7 February 2022	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
COA-4881998 Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	18 February 2021	Application Received In progress

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 19

1 lobbied · 8 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 19: 1 lobbied and 8 matched unlobbied applications in 1 matched stratum
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	1	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	8	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 19

6 lobbied · 28 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 19: 6 lobbied and 28 matched unlobbied applications in 5 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	6	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	28	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.