lobbyTO

Address

23 Beechwood Ave

Registrations naming this address
2
2 client organisations
Communications on those registrations
13
8 offices contacted
Applications at this address
1
No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items
0
Items naming this address

About this address

Ward
— (address points for this address fall in more than one ward)
Location
43.68083, -79.49392
How this address was located
Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

2

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Data table· 8 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
City Real Estate ManagementCity staff3220 October 2025
City Manager's OfficeCity staff225 June 2023
Rachel Chernos LinCouncillor staff222 April 2026
Rachel Chernos LinMember of council222 April 2026
Corporate Real Estate ManagementCity staff1017 December 2024
Transportation ServicesCity staff113 May 2023
Ward 15Councillor staff106 September 2024
Jaye RobinsonCouncillor staff109 May 2023
All registrations· 2 rows
RegistrationClientAs writtenSubject matterDatesCommunications
SM35836Times Group Corporation23 Beechwood Avenue.Real Estate / Property (City-owned)12 August 2024 – 23 July 20269
SM33625Doran Design Build23 Beechwood AvenueBy-law / Regulation; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Real Estate / Property (C…1 September 2022 – 30 June 20234

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

1
Data table· 1 row
ApplicationTypeSubmittedStatus
A0426/24NY
Committee of Adjustment application
Minor variance (MV)22 August 2024Closed
Approved

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 15

5 lobbied · 419 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied126
  • Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

  • Lobbied75% n=154
  • Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied25%
  • Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied19%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

  • Lobbied43%
  • Matched, unlobbied27%
Data table· 4 rows
Minor variance (MV), Ward 15: 5 lobbied and 419 matched unlobbied applications in 5 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateObjection rate
Lobbied5Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied419Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateObjection rate
Lobbied17312675% (n=154)25%19%43%
Matched, unlobbied3,64611491% (n=3,058)9%4%27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.