Address · Ward 13 · Chris Moise

225 Mutual St

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 5; 1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations: 14; 5 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 3; No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 13 · Chris Moise
Location: 43.66169, -79.37740
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Duration Investments LimitedSM16596 · 17 June 20118
Duration Investments LimitedSM20347 · 24 April 20142
Duration Investments LimitedSM20111 · 24 February 20142
Duration Investments LimitedSM18174 · 4 June 20122
Duration Investments LimitedSM17588 · 21 December 20110

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale7
Office of Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, Ward 272
Office of Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tom, Ward 272
Office of Councillor Wong-Tam, Ward 272
Office of Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam1

Data table· 5 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale	Member of council	7	5	13 September 2016
Office of Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, Ward 27	Councillor staff	2	1	13 September 2016
Office of Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tom, Ward 27	Councillor staff	2	1	13 September 2016
Office of Councillor Wong-Tam, Ward 27	Councillor staff	2	2	1 May 2014
Office of Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam	Councillor staff	1	1	21 January 2014

All registrations· 5 rows

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM20347	Duration Investments Limited	225 Mutual Street	Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law	24 April 2014 – 23 April 2019	2
SM20111	Duration Investments Limited	225 Mutual Street	Planning and Development, Combined Application	24 February 2014 – 8 March 2018	2
SM18174	Duration Investments Limited	225 Mutual Street	Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law	4 June 2012 – 1 October 2014	2
SM17588	Duration Investments Limited	225 Mutual Street	Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance	21 December 2011 – 21 December 2012	0
SM16596	Duration Investments Limited	225 Mutual Street	Planning and Development, Combined Application	17 June 2011 – 20 March 2019	8

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 12 December 2023Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 23 234823 STE 13 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 6 September 2019Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 19 217166 STE 13 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 29 November 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 257785 STE 27 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 3 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
23 234823 STE 13 CD Development application	Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)	12 December 2023	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
19 217166 STE 13 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	6 September 2019	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
16 257785 STE 27 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	29 November 2016	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 13

4 lobbied · 23 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 4 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 13: 4 lobbied and 23 matched unlobbied applications in 2 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	4	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	23	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13

56 lobbied · 128 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=5
Matched, unlobbied100% n=8

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied7%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13: 56 lobbied and 128 matched unlobbied applications in 32 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	56	—	100% (n=5)	0%	7%	0.16
Matched, unlobbied	128	—	100% (n=8)	0%	2%	0.01

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.