Address · Ward 4 · Gord Perks
222 Pearson Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 4 · Gord Perks
- Location
- 43.64182, -79.44871
- How this address was located
- Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 222A PEARSON AVE.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
6- Submitted 10 November 2020Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0091/20TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 18 January 2019Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0052/19TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 18 January 2019Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0053/19TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 18 January 2019Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0003/19TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 17 January 2019Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application COA-4512255Cancelled · Withdrawn
- Submitted 3 December 2018Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application COA-4494797Cancelled · Withdrawn
Data table· 6 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| B0091/20TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 10 November 2020 | Closed Approved |
| A0052/19TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 18 January 2019 | Closed Approved |
| A0053/19TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 18 January 2019 | Closed Approved |
| B0003/19TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 18 January 2019 | Closed Approved |
| COA-4512255 Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 17 January 2019 | Cancelled Withdrawn |
| COA-4494797 Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 3 December 2018 | Cancelled Withdrawn |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 4
8 lobbied · 130 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 130 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.