lobbyTO

Address · Ward 12 · Josh Matlow

2210 Yonge St

Registrations naming this address
2
2 client organisations
Communications on those registrations
14
6 offices contacted
Applications at this address
2
No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items
0
Items naming this address

About this address

Ward
Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
Location
43.70649, -79.39862
How this address was located
Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

2

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

  • Josh Matlow5
  • Councillor Michael Ford2
  • Councillor Michael Thompson2
  • Ward 21 Scarborough Centre2
  • Josh Matlow2
  • Councillor James Pasternak1
Data table· 6 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Josh MatlowCouncillor staff5416 April 2025
Councillor Michael FordCouncillor staff2012 July 2021
Councillor Michael ThompsonCouncillor staff2213 July 2021
Ward 21 Scarborough CentreMember of council2213 July 2021
Josh MatlowMember of council226 December 2024
Councillor James PasternakCouncillor staff1015 July 2021
All registrations· 2 rows
RegistrationClientAs writtenSubject matterDatesCommunications
SM30513OPGI Management GP Inc.2210 Yonge StreetPlanning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Pla…28 August 2020 – 31 December 202614
SM12537Abcon Media2210 Yonge StreetSigns24 November 2008 – 28 April 20090

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

2
Data table· 2 rows
ApplicationTypeSubmittedStatus
22 242145 STE 12 OZ
Development application
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)23 December 2022Under Review
In progress
20 232714 STE 12 OZ
Development application
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)21 December 2020Under Review
In progress

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12

44 lobbied · 60 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=9
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=9

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied14%
  • Matched, unlobbied10%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=78
  • Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied12%
  • Matched, unlobbied14%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12: 44 lobbied and 60 matched unlobbied applications in 26 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied44—100% (n=9)0%14%0.02
Matched, unlobbied60—100% (n=9)0%10%0.04
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied571—100% (n=78)0%12%0.08
Matched, unlobbied760—96% (n=78)4%14%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.