2205 Sheppard Avenue East

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 3; 1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations: 0
Applications at this address: 2; No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 17 · Shelley Carroll
Location: 43.77474, -79.33003
How this address was located: Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 2195 SHEPPARD AVE E (10 civic numbers away).

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Dorsay Development CorporationSM11869 · 16 June 20080
Dorsay Development CorporationSM11870 · 16 June 20080
Dorsay Development CorporationSM11366 · 15 March 20080

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

No communications recorded.

All registrations· 3 rows

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates
SM11869	Dorsay Development Corporation	2205 Sheppard Avenue East	Planning and Development (specify): Environmental Assessments	16 June 2008 – 31 December 2011
SM11870	Dorsay Development Corporation	2205 Sheppard Avenue East	Planning and Development (specify): Environmental Assessments	16 June 2008 – 31 December 2011
SM11366	Dorsay Development Corporation	2205 Sheppard Avenue East	Planning Application, Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw Amendments	15 March 2008 – 31 December 2013

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 31 December 2015Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1141/15NYNotice Prepared · Approved
Submitted 23 March 2015Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 15 131102 NNY 33 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 2 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
A1141/15NY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	31 December 2015	Notice Prepared Approved
15 131102 NNY 33 CD Development application	Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)	23 March 2015	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 17

2 lobbied · 54 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 17: 2 lobbied and 54 matched unlobbied applications in 1 matched stratum
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	2	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	54	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 2 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.