Address · Ward 1 · Vincent Crisanti
216 Dixon Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 1 · Vincent Crisanti
- Location
- 43.69798, -79.54399
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Office of Councillor Rob Ford, Ward 2 | Councillor staff | 9 | 0 | 8 February 2017 |
| Ward 2 Etobicoke North | Member of council | 2 | 1 | 26 October 2015 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM22262 | Northstone Homes Ltd. | 216 Dixon Road | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 28 September 2015 – 31 March 2018 | 11 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
5- Submitted 6 October 2016Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0790/16EYKClosed · Refused
- Submitted 6 October 2016Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0791/16EYKClosed · Refused
- Submitted 6 October 2016Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0792/16EYKClosed · Refused
- Submitted 6 October 2016Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0793/16EYKClosed · Refused
- Submitted 6 October 2016Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0075/16EYKClosed · Refused
Data table· 5 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0790/16EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 6 October 2016 | Closed Refused |
| A0791/16EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 6 October 2016 | Closed Refused |
| A0792/16EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 6 October 2016 | Closed Refused |
| A0793/16EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 6 October 2016 | Closed Refused |
| B0075/16EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 6 October 2016 | Closed Refused |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
216 Dixon Rd · Consent (severance) (CO)
B0075/16EYK · submitted 6 October 2016 · Closed · from registration SM22262 (Northstone Homes Ltd.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22262: 216 Dixon Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application B0075/16EYK at 216 Dixon Rd: To obtain consent to sever the property into four residential lots. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 216 Dixon Road
Matched fields
- address
- 216 DIXON RD
- application_address
- 216 DIXON RD
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 1
2 lobbied · 42 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 42 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 1
2 lobbied · 7 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 7 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.