Address · Ward 3 · Amber Morley
2157 Lake Shore Blvd W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 3 · Amber Morley
- Location
- 43.62532, -79.47953
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
4These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 7 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amber Morley | Councillor staff | 34 | 8 | 4 August 2026 |
| Amber Morley | Member of council | 6 | 0 | 20 May 2025 |
| Office of Councillor Grimes, Ward 3 | Councillor staff | 3 | 0 | 20 January 2020 |
| Office of Councillor Grimes | Councillor staff | 2 | 2 | 27 January 2020 |
| Toronto Building | City staff | 1 | 0 | 10 January 2014 |
| Ward 3 Etobicoke-Lakeshore | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 3 December 2020 |
| Ward 6 Etobicoke-Lakeshore | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 10 January 2014 |
All registrations· 4 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM29632 | Stay Inn Hospitality | 2157 Lake Shore Boulevard West | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 17 January 2020 – 1 December 2026 | 2 |
| SM29612 | Stay Inn Hospitality | 2157 Lake Shore Blvd W | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 13 January 2020 – 29 July 2020 | 3 |
| SM26523 | Stay Inn Hospitality | 2157 Lake Shore Boulevard West | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 20 July 2018 – 4 August 2026 | 1 |
| SM20374 | Graywood Developments Ltd. | 2157 Lake Shore Blvd. West. | Building Permits; Planning and Development, Combined Application | 10 January 2014 – 31 December 2026 | 42 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
5- Submitted 16 March 2020Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 20 126617 WET 03 OZCouncil Approved · Approved
- Submitted 7 August 2014Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 14 203065 WET 06 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 16 September 2011Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 11 276509 WET 06 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 16 September 2011Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 11 276514 WET 06 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 19 November 2008Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 08 223121 WET 06 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 5 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 126617 WET 03 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 16 March 2020 | Council Approved Approved |
| 14 203065 WET 06 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 7 August 2014 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 276509 WET 06 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 16 September 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 276514 WET 06 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 16 September 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 08 223121 WET 06 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 19 November 2008 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
2157 Lake Shore Blvd W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
20 126617 WET 03 OZ · submitted 16 March 2020 · Council Approved · from registration SM29612 (Stay Inn Hospitality)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM29612: Development proposal (rezoning) for 2157 Lake Shore Blvd W (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 126617 WET 03 OZ at 2157 Lake Shore Blvd W: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit a 13-storey (43.4 metres, excluding Mechanical Penthouse) hotel building . The proposal as revised would include 167 hotel suites and one level of underground parking, resulting in a total gross floor area of 8,119.8 square metres, as … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development proposal (rezoning) for 2157 Lake Shore Blvd W
Matched fields
- address
- 2157 LAKE SHORE BLVD W
- application_address
- 2157 LAKE SHORE BLVD W
2157 Lake Shore Blvd W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
20 126617 WET 03 OZ · submitted 16 March 2020 · Council Approved · from registration SM29632 (Stay Inn Hospitality)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM29632: To permit a hotel development at 2157 Lake Shore Boulevard West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 126617 WET 03 OZ at 2157 Lake Shore Blvd W: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit a 13-storey (43.4 metres, excluding Mechanical Penthouse) hotel building . The proposal as revised would include 167 hotel suites and one level of underground parking, resulting in a total gross floor area of 8,119.8 square metres, as … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: To permit a hotel development at 2157 Lake Shore Boulevard West
Matched fields
- address
- 2157 LAKE SHORE BLVD W
- application_address
- 2157 LAKE SHORE BLVD W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 3
37 lobbied · 72 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 37 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 16% | 0.27 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 15% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 3
24 lobbied · 100 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 24 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 4% | 0.25 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 100 | — | 71% (n=10) | 29% | 4% | 0.14 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.