Address · Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
2100 Yonge St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Location
- 43.70265, -79.39774
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 3 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate Real Estate Management | City staff | 5 | 0 | 8 December 2020 |
| Corporate Services, Deputy City Manager | City staff | 2 | 0 | 8 December 2020 |
| Councillor Matlow | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 30 October 2017 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM25160 | Rockport Incorporated | 2100 Yonge Street. | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 13 October 2017 – 20 April 2025 | 9 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
5- Submitted 14 February 2025Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0012/25TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 9 August 2024Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 24 195552 STE 12 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 26 April 2022Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0560/22TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 28 July 2020Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 20 173536 STE 12 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 4 June 2018Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 18 171536 STE 22 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 5 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| B0012/25TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 14 February 2025 | Closed Approved |
| 24 195552 STE 12 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 9 August 2024 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A0560/22TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 26 April 2022 | Closed Approved |
| 20 173536 STE 12 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 28 July 2020 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 18 171536 STE 22 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 4 June 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
2100 Yonge St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
20 173536 STE 12 SA · submitted 28 July 2020 · Closed · from registration SM25237 (Rockport Homes Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25237: 2100-2110 Yonge Street and 8-12 Manor Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 173536 STE 12 SA at 2100 Yonge St: Site Plan Application to permit a 12-storey mixed-use building, with a proposed height of 40.3 metres. Proposal includes 85 new residential units and 7 rental replacement units, 7,357.0 square metres of residential gross floor area, and 298.0 square metres of retail space on the ground floor. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 2100-2110 Yonge Street and 8-12 Manor Road
Matched fields
- address
- 2100-2110 YONGE ST
- application_address
- 2100 YONGE ST
2100 Yonge St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
18 171536 STE 22 OZ · submitted 4 June 2018 · Closed · from registration SM25160 (Rockport Incorporated)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25160: Assisting with the development of 2100 Yonge Street. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 171536 STE 22 OZ at 2100 Yonge St: Zoning By-law Amendment application to facilitate redevelopment of the site with a 12-storey mixed-use building, with a height of 35 metres. 84 new residential units and 7 rental replacement units, 7203.0 square metres of residential gross floor area, and 287.0 square metres of retail space on the … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Assisting with the development of 2100 Yonge Street.
Matched fields
- address
- 2100 YONGE ST
- application_address
- 2100 YONGE ST
2100 Yonge St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
18 171536 STE 22 OZ · submitted 4 June 2018 · Closed · from registration SM25237 (Rockport Homes Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25237: 2100-2110 Yonge Street and 8-12 Manor Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 171536 STE 22 OZ at 2100 Yonge St: Zoning By-law Amendment application to facilitate redevelopment of the site with a 12-storey mixed-use building, with a height of 35 metres. 84 new residential units and 7 rental replacement units, 7203.0 square metres of residential gross floor area, and 287.0 square metres of retail space on the … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 2100-2110 Yonge Street and 8-12 Manor Road
Matched fields
- address
- 2100-2110 YONGE ST
- application_address
- 2100 YONGE ST
2100 Yonge St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
18 171536 STE 22 OZ · submitted 4 June 2018 · Closed · from registration SM29151 (Rockport Yonge and Manor Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM29151: Assisting with the development of 2100-2110 Yonge Street and 8-12 Manor Road East. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 171536 STE 22 OZ at 2100 Yonge St: Zoning By-law Amendment application to facilitate redevelopment of the site with a 12-storey mixed-use building, with a height of 35 metres. 84 new residential units and 7 rental replacement units, 7203.0 square metres of residential gross floor area, and 287.0 square metres of retail space on the … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Assisting with the development of 2100-2110 Yonge Street and 8-12 Manor Road East.
Matched fields
- address
- 2100-2110 YONGE ST
- application_address
- 2100 YONGE ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 12
5 lobbied · 11 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 11 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 12
20 lobbied · 357 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | 106 | 50% (n=12) | 50% | 35% | 86% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 357 | 145 | 90% (n=291) | 10% | 5% | 30% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12
32 lobbied · 72 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 32 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 3% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12
44 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 44 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 14% | 0.02 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.