Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
21 Widmer St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.64714, -79.39115
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Executive Assistant for Councillor Adam Vaughan | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 5 July 2011 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM16704 | Daniels HR Corporation | 21 Widmer Street | Arts / Culture; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 5 July 2011 – 1 September 2011 | 1 |
| SM11656 | The Daniels Corporation | 21 Widmer Street | Planning Application, Zoning By-Law & Site Plan | 1 May 2008 – 31 December 2012 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 11 March 2013Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 13 131304 STE 20 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 11 January 2013Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 13 104485 STE 20 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 15 December 2008Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 08 229834 STE 20 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 12 March 2008Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 08 118571 STE 20 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13 131304 STE 20 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 11 March 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 13 104485 STE 20 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 11 January 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 08 229834 STE 20 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 15 December 2008 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 08 118571 STE 20 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 12 March 2008 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
21 Widmer St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
08 229834 STE 20 SA · submitted 15 December 2008 · Closed · from registration SM11656 (The Daniels Corporation)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM11656: 21 Widmer Street Development Application Zoning By-Law Amendment Site Plan (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 229834 STE 20 SA at 21 Widmer St: Proposed 43 storey mixed-use building with 447 dwelling units & 4 levels of underground parking, a portion of which would be used as commercial parking garage. A two storey glazed portion of the building (proposed to be devoted to Artscape) would be included in the proposal. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 21 Widmer Street Development Application Zoning By-Law Amendment Site Plan
Matched fields
- address
- 21 WIDMER ST
- application_address
- 21 WIDMER ST
31 Widmer St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
08 118571 STE 20 OZ · submitted 12 March 2008 · Closed · from registration SM11656 (The Daniels Corporation)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.95
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM11656: 21 Widmer Street Development Application Zoning By-Law Amendment Site Plan (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 118571 STE 20 OZ at 31 Widmer St: Proposed 43 storey mixed-use building with 447 dwelling units & 4 levels of underground parking, a portion of which would be used as commercial parking garage. A community performance space located on the ground floor is provided to be used by Artscape. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 21 Widmer Street Development Application Zoning By-Law Amendment Site Plan
Matched fields
- address
- 21 WIDMER ST
- application_address
- 21 WIDMER ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 10
4 lobbied · 25 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 25 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 10% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.