Address · Ward 13 · Chris Moise
21 Melinda St
- Communications on those registrations
- 0
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Location
- 43.64819, -79.37850
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM27126 | QuadReal Property Group on behalf of bcIMC Realty Corporation | 21 Melinda St | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 4 December 2018 – 31 December 2020 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 26 August 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 204526 STE 13 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 20 December 2017Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 17 277715 STE 28 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 204526 STE 13 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 26 August 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| 17 277715 STE 28 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 20 December 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
25 King St W · Site Plan Approval (SA)
21 204526 STE 13 SA · submitted 26 August 2021 · Under Review · from registration SM27126 (QuadReal Property Group on behalf of bcIMC Realty Corporation)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.81
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM27126: Planning Application- Commerce Court (25 King Street W, 199 Bay, 30 Wellington St W, 21 Melinda St, 56 Yonge Street) (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 204526 STE 13 SA at 25 King St W: Site Plan Approval for a 64-storey non-residential building having a gross floor area of 163,201.0 square metres. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning Application- Commerce Court (25 King Street W, 199 Bay, 30 Wellington St W, 21 Melinda St, 56 Yonge Street)
Matched fields
- address
- 25 KING ST W
- application_address
- 25 KING ST W
30 Wellington St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
17 277715 STE 28 OZ · submitted 20 December 2017 · Closed · from registration SM25616 (QuadReal Property Group Limited Partnership)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25616: Lobbying for rezoning bylaw amendments for the following project: Commerce Court Complex (25 King Street West, 199 Bay Street, 30 Wellington Street West), and 56 Yonge Street. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 277715 STE 28 OZ at 30 Wellington St W: Revised Zoning By-law Amendment to permit the construction of a 65-storey office-retail building with a height of 300 metres, and a 3-storey pavilion with a gross floor area of 169,781 sq.m. on the existing Commerce Court site. The existing Commerce Court South building is proposed to be demolished… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Lobbying for rezoning bylaw amendments for the following project: Commerce Court Complex (25 King Street West, 199 Bay Street, 30 Wellington Street West), and 56 Yonge Street.
Matched fields
- address
- 25 KING ST W
- application_address
- 25 KING ST W
30 Wellington St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
17 277715 STE 28 OZ · submitted 20 December 2017 · Closed · from registration SM27126 (QuadReal Property Group on behalf of bcIMC Realty Corporation)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.93
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM27126: Planning Application- Commerce Court (25 King Street W, 199 Bay, 30 Wellington St W, 21 Melinda St, 56 Yonge Street) (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 277715 STE 28 OZ at 30 Wellington St W: Revised Zoning By-law Amendment to permit the construction of a 65-storey office-retail building with a height of 300 metres, and a 3-storey pavilion with a gross floor area of 169,781 sq.m. on the existing Commerce Court site. The existing Commerce Court South building is proposed to be demolished… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning Application- Commerce Court (25 King Street W, 199 Bay, 30 Wellington St W, 21 Melinda St, 56 Yonge Street)
Matched fields
- address
- 25 KING ST W
- application_address
- 25 KING ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13
56 lobbied · 128 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 56 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 7% | 0.16 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 128 | — | 100% (n=8) | 0% | 2% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13
82 lobbied · 96 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 82 | — | 100% (n=13) | 0% | 11% | 0.15 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 96 | — | 90% (n=14) | 10% | 16% | 0.08 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.