Address · Ward 5 · Frances Nunziata
2062 Weston Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 5 · Frances Nunziata
- Location
- 43.70157, -79.52216
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
3These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 5 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayor John Tory | Councillor staff | 4 | 0 | 17 February 2021 |
| Ward 11 York South-Weston | Member of council | 4 | 4 | 25 January 2018 |
| Office of Councillor Nunziata, Ward 11 | Councillor staff | 3 | 3 | 25 January 2018 |
| Councillor Frances Nunziata | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 10 November 2020 |
| Ward 5 York South-Weston | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 10 November 2020 |
All registrations· 3 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM30578 | 2062 Weston Road Holdings Ltd. | 2062 Weston Road | Planning and Development; Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Develop… | 21 September 2020 – 21 September 2021 | 6 |
| SM25486 | 2062 Weston Road Holdings Ltd. | 2062 Weston Road | Economic Development; Financial Services | 25 January 2018 – 1 December 2021 | 1 |
| SM25442 | 2062 Weston Road Holdings Ltd. | 2062 Weston Road. | Financial Services | 14 December 2017 – 31 December 2021 | 6 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
1- Submitted 29 October 2009Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 09 183714 WET 11 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 1 row
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09 183714 WET 11 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 29 October 2009 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 5
12 lobbied · 17 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 12 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.