Address · Ward 17 · Shelley Carroll
2045 Sheppard Avenue East.
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 17 · Shelley Carroll
- Location
- 43.77529, -79.33063
- How this address was located
- Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 2040 SHEPPARD AVE E (5 civic numbers away).
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Office of Councillor Carroll, Ward 33 | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 12 March 2012 |
| Ward 33 Don Valley East | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 12 March 2012 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM17880 | Monarch Corporation | 2045 Sheppard Avenue East. | Building Permits | 9 March 2012 – 30 May 2017 | 2 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 28 April 2010Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 10 165327 NNY 33 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 1 December 2009Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 09 193025 NNY 33 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 165327 NNY 33 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 28 April 2010 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 09 193025 NNY 33 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 1 December 2009 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 17
14 lobbied · 20 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 14 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 20 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.