Address · Ward 22 · Nick Mantas
2031 Kennedy Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 22 · Nick Mantas
- Location
- 43.77714, -79.28463
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 22 Scarborough-Agincourt | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 18 February 2020 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM29462 | Kingdom Development Inc. | 2031 Kennedy Rd. | Planning and Development Application, Consent to Sever; Planning and Development Application, Part … | 20 December 2019 – 20 December 2020 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
5- Submitted 27 October 2023Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 23 219355 ESC 21 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 11 May 2022Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 22 145692 ESC 21 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 1 April 2021Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0166/21SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 16 December 2019Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0057/19SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 16 December 2019Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application COA-4696501Cancelled · Withdrawn
Data table· 5 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23 219355 ESC 21 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 27 October 2023 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 22 145692 ESC 21 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 11 May 2022 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A0166/21SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 1 April 2021 | Closed Approved |
| B0057/19SC Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 16 December 2019 | Closed Approved |
| COA-4696501 Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 16 December 2019 | Cancelled Withdrawn |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
2031 Kennedy Rd · Consent (severance) (CO)
B0057/19SC · submitted 16 December 2019 · Closed · from registration SM29462 (Kingdom Development Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM29462: Facilitate land development at 2031 Kennedy Rd. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application B0057/19SC at 2031 Kennedy Rd: Consent to convey a 89.92 sq. m. parcel of land on the vertical plane (Parts 16, 28, 30 and 31 on the draft Reference Plan) as a lot addition to the Hotel Property to the east at 2035 Kennedy Road. An easement will be retained for maintenance, repair, and installation of utilities and services, alo… (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Facilitate land development at 2031 Kennedy Rd.
Matched fields
- address
- 2031 KENNEDY RD
- application_address
- 2031 KENNEDY RD
2031 Kennedy Rd · Consent (severance) (CO)
COA-4696501 · submitted 16 December 2019 · Cancelled · from registration SM29462 (Kingdom Development Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM29462: Facilitate land development at 2031 Kennedy Rd. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application COA-4696501 at 2031 Kennedy Rd: (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Facilitate land development at 2031 Kennedy Rd.
Matched fields
- address
- 2031 KENNEDY RD
- application_address
- 2031 KENNEDY RD
Council and committee items naming this address
- 2031 Kennedy Road - Zoning Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval2024.SC10.3 · 19 January 2024
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 21
15 lobbied · 21 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 15 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 21 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 21
3 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 3 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 21
3 lobbied · 5 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 3 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.