Address · Ward 13 · Chris Moise
203 Jarvis St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Location
- 43.65565, -79.37362
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
5These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 3 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 13 | Councillor staff | 6 | 0 | 7 October 2019 |
| Ward 13 Toronto Centre | Member of council | 4 | 4 | 7 October 2019 |
| Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 14 December 2015 |
All registrations· 5 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM28877 | Manga Hotels Toronto Inc. | 203 Jarvis St | Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 20 September 2019 – 20 September 2020 | 6 |
| SM28254 | Manga Hotels | 203 Jarvis Street | Planning and Development, Planning Policy / Study; Planning and Development Application, Plan of Co… | 29 May 2019 – 15 April 2024 | 2 |
| SM28262 | Manga Hotels | 203 Jarvis St. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 29 May 2019 – 10 March 2021 | 2 |
| SM22576 | Manga Hotels Toronto Inc. | 203 Jarvis Street | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 14 December 2015 – 14 December 2018 | 1 |
| SM13570 | Manga Hotels (Downtown) Inc. | 203 Jarvis Street | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 8 October 2009 – 5 September 2012 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
6- Submitted 17 September 2024Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0059/24TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 23 October 2023Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0940/23TEYApproved · Approved
- Submitted 26 September 2018Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 18 232301 STE 27 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 15 August 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 207248 STE 27 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 12 February 2008Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 08 110771 STE 27 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 12 February 2008Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 08 110804 STE 27 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 6 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| B0059/24TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 17 September 2024 | Closed Approved |
| A0940/23TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 23 October 2023 | Approved Approved |
| 18 232301 STE 27 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 26 September 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 16 207248 STE 27 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 15 August 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 08 110771 STE 27 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 12 February 2008 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 08 110804 STE 27 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 12 February 2008 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
203 Jarvis St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
18 232301 STE 27 SA · submitted 26 September 2018 · Closed · from registration SM28254 (Manga Hotels)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM28254: 203 Jarvis Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 232301 STE 27 SA at 203 Jarvis St: Proposed 32-storey (107.1 metres including the mechanical penthouse) mixed-use tower containing 240 hotel suites and 179 dwelling units. The total gross floor area is 21,206.2 square metres. Four levels of underground parking are proposed with 46 parking spaces for residents, 29 parking spaces for … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 203 Jarvis Street
Matched fields
- address
- 203 JARVIS ST
- application_address
- 203 JARVIS ST
203 Jarvis St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
18 232301 STE 27 SA · submitted 26 September 2018 · Closed · from registration SM28262 (Manga Hotels)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM28262: Application in support of redevelopment of 203 Jarvis St. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 232301 STE 27 SA at 203 Jarvis St: Proposed 32-storey (107.1 metres including the mechanical penthouse) mixed-use tower containing 240 hotel suites and 179 dwelling units. The total gross floor area is 21,206.2 square metres. Four levels of underground parking are proposed with 46 parking spaces for residents, 29 parking spaces for … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Application in support of redevelopment of 203 Jarvis St.
Matched fields
- address
- 203 JARVIS ST
- application_address
- 203 JARVIS ST
203 Jarvis St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
18 232301 STE 27 SA · submitted 26 September 2018 · Closed · from registration SM28877 (Manga Hotels Toronto Inc.)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.92
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM28877: 203 Jarvis St (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 232301 STE 27 SA at 203 Jarvis St: Proposed 32-storey (107.1 metres including the mechanical penthouse) mixed-use tower containing 240 hotel suites and 179 dwelling units. The total gross floor area is 21,206.2 square metres. Four levels of underground parking are proposed with 46 parking spaces for residents, 29 parking spaces for … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 203 Jarvis St
Matched fields
- address
- 203 JARVIS ST
- application_address
- 203 JARVIS ST
203 Jarvis St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
08 110771 STE 27 OZ · submitted 12 February 2008 · Closed · from registration SM13570 (Manga Hotels (Downtown) Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM13570: 203 Jarvis Street, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 110771 STE 27 OZ at 203 Jarvis St: This application proposes to redevelop the existing commercial surface parking lot at 203 Jarvis Street with a 20-storey hotel containing 261 guest rooms with a proposed building height of 61 metres (66 metres including mechanical penthouse) and a gross floor area of 14,702 square metres. The appli… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 203 Jarvis Street, Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 203 JARVIS ST
- application_address
- 203 JARVIS ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 13
5 lobbied · 76 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 76 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13
56 lobbied · 128 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 56 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 7% | 0.16 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 128 | — | 100% (n=8) | 0% | 2% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13
82 lobbied · 96 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 82 | — | 100% (n=13) | 0% | 11% | 0.15 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 96 | — | 90% (n=14) | 10% | 16% | 0.08 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.